| |
Part 1 |
Part 2 |
|
|
Part 3 |
|
|
| ID-4 |
Total |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
Scoring Notes Part 2 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
Scoring Notes - Parts 1 and
3 |
3.1 Notes |
| 1026 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
15 |
/-10/
Extremely short, vague on all issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1161 |
75 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
10 |
/-10/. Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the second chart has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since
no specific examples are given |
Nevertheless --> wrong word |
| 1370 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong |
constrain X Essential
takes requires X |
| 1385 |
61 |
2 |
16 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
Missing HTML Tags <b><li></b><br>.
(Almost entire content quoted) |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 3 points off since the summary chart isn't complete and the
graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.3 4 points off since the definition is
wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse isn't an example for essential
complexity |
it frees X like his X |
| 1461 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
13 |
Links
at top don't work. Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, specific functionality
of Google other than searching). Met
all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no corrrect specific example is mentioned
3.7 2 points off since no specific high level languages are mentioned |
and, --> no comma
literally --> avoid this word
argue X |
| 1489 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Met all requirements. However, too many lists about XP. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
3.7 2 points off since the reason why Java helps reduce
accidental complexity isn't clear |
prefect X goes on
--> eliminate |
| 1504 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.4 2 points
off since only complexity and changebility are mentioned 3.6 5 points off
since no specific example is mentioned |
so much … began X |
| 1520 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. All of the information
was present, just not separated well. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
2 --> use two |
| 1691 |
99 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Very informative. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
in either productivity, in X |
| 1701 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Informative, however, titles would have made it easier to follow. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 1862 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Good. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 points off
since the calculation is wrong 3.5,3.6&3.7 all missing |
bad affect X |
| 1997 |
79 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. Short. |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off
since no answer |
annoyances --> wrong word |
| 2039 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking content (size). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate
3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given |
Brooks X (missing ') |
| 2047 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3.6 3 points off because there are many types of pseudo code and
it's not specified how it might address essential complexity. |
a magnitude --> leaves out "order of" essence include X |
| 2118 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are
missing |
creating them X Brook's X |
| 2145 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2168 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Largely quoted text. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example
for accidental complexity |
First off --> slangy |
| 2171 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Cool pictures. |
5 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since real time is used instead of initial
estimate 2.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off
since IDE is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 2210 |
99 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
because .. because --> awkward essence X (s.b. essential) |
| 2340 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
time of a start X |
| 2446 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Missing section headings. Lessons vague. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.6 5 points off since
no specific example is given |
essay title incorrect X
reasoning on X |
| 2540 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off
since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since Excel is an example of
technology for accidental complexity |
past … in the past --> redundant |
| 2574 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental
complexity |
inherited X accidental X
(s.b. essential) |
| 2595 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized
3.6 5 points off since Java and C++ are specific examples for accidental
complexity |
|
| 2613 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Lacking Content (What went wrong at
IBM?). Met all other
requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and invisibility are
mentioned |
the gains flow X in which
X |
| 2614 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Cool banners. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since no specific example is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason why VB
helps reducing accidental complexity isn't explained |
|
| 2712 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
in which X |
| 2829 |
73 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.1 missing 1.3 4 points off since the logging entries are not
categorized and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off
since IDE is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 2873 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
3.6 5 points off since Oracle isn't an example for essential
complexity 3.7 1 point off since no specific high level language is mentioned |
base his X |
| 2899 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Real time is
used instead of initial estimation 3.6 5 points off since the answer is
missing |
is just that --> awkward |
| 3045 |
54 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
Did not submit. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off
since Java is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 3049 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is different from the
chart in 1.2 3.6&3.7 answers are missing |
describes … into X
complexity would be complexity --> unclear; use is |
| 3079 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 3082 |
81 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Lacking Content
(System Size, Other features of Google, such as Gmail, etc...). Met all other requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
a werewolves X cutting
down … increase X |
| 3131 |
74 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
15 |
/-10/. The text is almost entirely direct
quotations. |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is missing 3.3 2 points
off since the definition is partly correct 3.6 5 points off since no specific
example is given |
Cry X Changeability is X |
| 3133 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
13 |
Did not link website banner properly. Lacking Content/Uninformative. Met all other requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part 1&3 are missing |
|
| 3184 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Did not describe specifics of
the software system) Met all other
requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3.6 3 points off because it is not made clear what part of
essential complexity is reduced by documentation. |
|
| 3196 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
13 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
there is bullets X
bullets. --> sloppy |
| 3266 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Not organized with assignment sections. |
5 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.2 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points
off since Java or .NET are examples for accidental complexity |
|
| 3318 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 4 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off
since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Word is an example for
accidental complexity |
accidents X |
| 3409 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the
summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6&3.7
answers are missing |
|
| 3452 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking content (Sections are vague). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off
since no calculation 3.7 5 points off since no specific example is given |
Accidents of Software Engineering X |
| 3466 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Excellent! |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example
is given |
accidence X which or X |
| 3579 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off
since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the
answers are missing |
|
| 3679 |
82 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Lacking content (lessons learned). Met all other
requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since the specific example given "Lotus
Notes" cannot reduce essential complexity |
Would be --> use is
Even by X |
| 3789 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all
requirements. |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.6 1 point off for not
clearly giving example as an example |
order words X |
| 3829 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3845 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 3 points
off since no explaination on why Java/c++ are examples for accidental
complexity |
Brooks' points X |
| 3850 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Great Web Design. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6
5 points off since no technology is mentioned to reduce essential
complexity. |
namely, things like …; etc. --> awkward! |
| 3885 |
94 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5
points off because configuration management addresses accidental complexity. |
wherewolves X |
| 3935 |
68 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
8 |
/-10/ Tags out of order
<a><h4></a></h4>. Missing archival source. Met all
other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.3 2 points off since the definition
isn't complete 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are
missing |
aviodable --> avoided
be solved X |
| 3993 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since Visio is an example for accidental
complexity 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Word is an example for
accidental complexity isn't explained |
complexity are X |
| 4013 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
discusses about X are no
X |
| 4026 |
44 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2&3.3 each has
4 points off since the definitions are wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse
is an example for accidental complexity only |
in need to X |
| 4035 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 4184 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Very descriptive. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since high level language isn't an example for
essential complexity |
|
| 4197 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Links broken (many go to external pages). Otherwise, excellent! |
5 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3.4
3 points off since only complexity is mentioned |
|
| 4241 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no specifc example is mentioned 3.7 2
points off since the reason why IDE helps reducing accidental complexity
isn't explained |
properties is X it's X |
| 4294 |
98 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
project X the unclear X |
| 4378 |
86 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.3 4 points off
since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since OO is an example for
accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level language
is mentioned |
has devoted X |
| 4439 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
3.6&3.7 each has 1 point off since the reasons are not
clearly explained |
A programmer … may differ --> ??? which has X |
| 4465 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since Lotus isn't an example for essential
complexity |
2 --> use "two" |
| 4518 |
96 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
13 |
HTML Errors. Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
quips --> wrong word |
| 4582 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since Java is a specific example for accidental complexity |
Bullter X software are X |
| 4656 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
13 |
/-10/ Links are difficult to see on blue background, odd
characters are present. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off
since the answer is missing 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level
language is mentioned |
mentions that X implement
for X |
| 4725 |
94 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since expert system isn't an example for
essential complexity. Expert system may help reducing programming error which
is accecidental instead of essential |
Brooks X (missing ') |
| 4744 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
1.3 2 ponts off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since the examples are all used for accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off
since answer is vague and not specific |
|
| 4841L |
83 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Link within History portion didn't work. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.2 2 points off since the definition is vague 3.3 2 points off
since the definition is partly correct 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off
since no specific examples are mentioned |
idea's X |
| 4841V |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4895 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Links broken (all to external pages); black text on a dark
background. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since Adobe Acrobat Reader isn't a specific
example for essential complexity |
reason to, true to X |
| 4909 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since Microsoft’s Visual Studio isn't an example for essential complexity |
|
| 5163 |
77 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. Did not format tables properly in
html. |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
3.3 4 points off since the difinition is missing 3.7 5 points
off since no specific example is mentioned |
Brooks gives X irreducible X |
| 5185 |
52 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
/-10/ Lacking content, only addresses description. No section
headings, no archive citation. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 2 points off since the calculation is missing 3.4 4 points
off since the 4 reasons are not given 3.5 3 points off since no opinion is
seen 3.6&3.7 each has 4 points off since no specific examples are given |
Brook. Argues X years times X |
| 5235 |
79 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/ Good. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6 5 points off since Visio isn't an example for essential
complexity 3.7 5 points off since the answer is missing |
persons X |
| 5279 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Artistic! |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 2
points off since the reason why Java or IDE is an example for accidental
complexity isn't explained |
agreeable --> wrong word
lay X (s.b. slay) |
| 5315 |
96 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3.6
2 points off since no description of why rapid prototyping and incremental
development reduce essential complexity
3.7 2 points off since no description of what features of Eclipse
reduce accidental complexity |
|
| 5426 |
52 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 2 points off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off
no specific example is mentioned |
Brook's X |
| 5476 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
HTML Errors. Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since high level language is an example for
accidental complexity |
Brook X separate X |
| 5512 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are
mentioned. CVS is used to reduce accidental complexity |
accidental != unplanned
that is X |
| 5680 |
82 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Used a lot
quotes. Link from index did not
work. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.3 3 points off since "total" is missing from the
summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the initial estimate isn't used 3.5 3
points off since only complexity is mentioned |
addresses that X |
| 5717 |
82 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
23 |
15 |
Met all requirements. However, mainly lists and large quotes. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.5 missing
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
|
| 5724 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Good. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no answer to this question |
|
| 5792 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. Awesome logos. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing |
programming as a human X
complexity inherited X |
| 5812 |
85 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
13 |
Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Lacking Content (Causes of success portion
was vague, as was the Lessons Learned section). |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the
summary chart 3.2 4 points off since the definition is incorrect 3.6 5 points
off since Visio isn't a specific example for essential complexity |
peoples X (missing ') |
| 5832 |
59 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
/-10/. Much of the text is direct quotations, with
source given, but no quotation marks. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
Brooks, then --> drop comma
that Brooks gives X |
| 6031 |
85 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. Made
an effort to paraphrase, and put things into own words. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since the specific example given is wrong |
|
| 6033 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned |
on order X in result by X |
| 6209 |
96 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.3 take 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different
logging entries from the one in 1.2
1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial estimate |
removed from all repetition X |
| 6327 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Nice design. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong. The time went-off is
divided by the actual time instead of initial estimation. 3.6 5 points off.
No answer to this question 3.7 5 points off. No answer to this question |
complexity is problems X |
| 6398 |
81 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
13 |
/-10/ Some HTML links don't work. Met all other requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since the answer is wrong |
complexity that are X
refers these X |
| 6432 |
73 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. This was very
informative. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.5 4 points off
since the discussion is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since
answers are missing |
which designed X |
| 6455 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
Lacking Content, particularly the causes and lessons learned.
Met all other requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off
since the calculation is missing 3.6 I'm not sure whether Jcreator is an
example. From the description, Jcreator helps students visualize how a Java
program works. I don't think that's essential complexity 3.7 1 point off
since the reason is incomplete |
complexity in the other hand is X long time than X |
| 6491 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.2&3.3 each
has 2 points off since the definitions are incomplete 3.6 5 points off since
the answer is missing |
time advances --> wrong word
complexity are X |
| 6608 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. Some large quoted text. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.4 2 points off since calculation is missing 3.6 5 points off
since no specific example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since no commercial
tool is mentioned as an example of high level languages |
becoming huge problems X |
| 6745 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Last two sections mainly bulleted text. Met other
requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 6849 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
3.5 2 points off since the author's opinion isn't clear 3.6 5
points off since no specific example is given |
|
| 6923 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (Need to be more specific as to what went
wrong). Great web design. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial
estimate 3.6 4 points off since no specific example of technology for
essential complexity is mentioned 3.7 4 points off. The same reason as 3.6 |
|
| 7092 |
80 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
10 |
Well designed. Not very
informative (i.e. What is the PageRank
system?). Missing archival
source. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial
estimate 3.2 1 point off since the understanding of "high level
languages, time-sharing and unified programming environment" is wrong
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
those are Aristotle's words --> ??!! Brookes X
4 --> use four
essences --> wrong word therefore money --> awkward |
| 7202 |
79 |
2 |
13 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.2 3 points off since the logging entries are not clear 1.3 2
points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off because configuration
management addresses accidental complexity. |
is hard X |
| 7272 |
86 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Good. |
4 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.3 2 points off since the
definition is incomplete 3.62 points off since it's not explained why it
helps reduce essential complexity 3.7 5 points off since the answer is
missing |
exists four X
inadvertently --> wrong word |
| 7293 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (System Size, Description of IBM System). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 2 points off since the definition is vague. 3.6 5 points off
since the given example isn't for essential complexity |
programs must lie X
that. --> sloppy |
| 7400 |
79 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (About 500 words). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since no definitions
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no answers |
essence X (s.b. plural) |
| 7409 |
86 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.3 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off
since Excel is an example for accidental complexity 3.7 5 points off since
the answer is missing |
|
| 7520 |
75 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
12 |
15 |
/-10/. Most of the
website was quoted… did not take time to rephrase. Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing |
governing X visions…
lies X |
| 7692 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
|
| 7785 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.3 6 points off since the anlaysis is totally wrong |
Brooks X (missing ') |
| 7857 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
10 |
Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. Short. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7
each has 5 points off since no specific examples are mentioned. |
|
| 7862 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given 3.7 5 points off
since the answer is missing |
|
| 7913 |
96 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1.3
2 points off since the graph is missing 3.7 1 point off since a specific
example of source control tools isn't given |
ease of change X |
| 8087 |
99 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Nice design. However, links to left don't
work. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
underlying, abstract X |
| 8154 |
94 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
essence difficulties X |
| 8274 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (What about the software? System Size?). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each
has 5 points off since answers are missing |
Brook's X |
| 8292 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
13 |
Lacking Content (all sections are vague). Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since the given example is wrong 3.7 2 points off since no commercial tool is
mentioned |
|
| 8300 |
86 |
0 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.1,1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific
example is mentioned |
complexities deals X |
| 8335 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since high level languages are for accidental complexity |
subjects … deals X |
| 8341 |
42 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
4 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4&1. 5 are
missing 3.3 4 points off since no definition is found 3.6 5 points off since
no specific example is given |
may cause may X |
| 8455 |
59 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Some text is directly quoted without quotation marks; in first
paragraph citation is incorrect. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
IBM's X |
| 8457 |
65 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
15 |
Met
all requirements. However, used large paragraph-sized quotes. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 all missing 3.6 5 points off since Visual
Studio is an example for accidental complexity |
such as … etc.--> conflicting |
| 8462 |
82 |
2 |
13 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.2&1.3 3 points off since the log entries are not
categorized. 3.2 4 points off. The definition is wrong. Essential complexity
is not caused by implementation 3.6 5
points off. Eclipse is used to reduce accidental complexity instead of
essential complexity 3.7
5 points off. Windlx is a tool to speed up prototype, so it's used to reduce
essential complexity |
being X |
| 8510 |
80 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.3 4 points off since the
definition is wrong 3.6&3.7 each has 5 pooints off since no specific
examples are mentioned |
program are X |
| 8531 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Initial
esitmation is not used. 3.6 5 points off since LabView is mentioned to reduce
invisibility and is used to reduce ambiguity during implemetation, so it's
for accidental complexity |
reason believe X big on
--> awkward much like --> you
mean unlike near impossible --> too dang informal X |
| 8554 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1.3
2 points off since the category "research" is missing from the
column graph 3.6 the reason why
Rational Unified Process helps reducing essential complexity isn't clearly
explained. |
|
| 8599 |
79 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking content (what was the size, causes of success or
failure). Met all other requirements. |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 calculation is wrong 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since
the definitions are missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6
5 points off since C# is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 8668 |
84 |
0 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.1 2 points off since initial estimation is missing 1.3 1 point
off since the graph is wrong 3.2&3.3 each has 2 points off since the
definitions are incomplete 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is
mentioned |
stated X complicity X |
| 8725 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.3 2 points off since the definition isn't complete 3.6&3.7
each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
The is no X |
| 8779 |
86 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
HTML Errors (white text on white background). Met all
requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6&3.7 each has
5 points off since no specific examples are given |
|
| 8782 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example for accidental
complexity |
want --> wrong word (need)
the when X |
| 8989 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
language itself --> unnec. |
| 9074 |
85 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
10 |
Missing archival source.
Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Lessons Learned). Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off
since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing |
|
| 9190 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Great Web Design. |
3 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 take 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since no
definition for essential and accidental complexity 3.6&3.7 each has 5
points off since no specific example is mentioned |
bullets is X that silver
bullets X giving out -->
awkward anyone that --> use who |
| 9199 |
96 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
1.3
2 points off since the graph is missing 3.7 1 point off since a specific
example of high level languages isn't given |
providence X (s.b. provenance) |
| 9239 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. Many large quotes. |
4 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
5 |
1.3
2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2 2 points off since the definition
is partially correct 3.3 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.5 1 point
off since the reason isn't explained |
effect's X we can … you had --> don't switch
pronoun |
| 9390 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since PowerPoint isn't an example for essential complexity |
|
| 9486 |
98 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3.6 2 points off since why UML is an example for essential
complexity isn't explained |
|
| 9491 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Great schematic. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no specifc example is mentioned 3.7 2
points off since the reason why high level languages help reducing accidental
complexity isn't explained |
magnitude --> left out order of This does not mean X (missing
"not") |
| 9498 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since flow chart is used to reduce ambiguity
during implemetation, so it's for accidental complexity |
Brooks talks … --> too long a sentence |
| 9503 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lack of Content (System Size, Successes/Failures, etc…). Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing |
|
| 9530 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 3 points off since "total" is mising in the
summary chart and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off since the calculation
is wrong 3.6 5 points off since no exmaple is given 3.7 2 points off since
the reason isn't explained |
|
| 9671 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3.2&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definition is vague.
3.6 the reason why unit testing helps reducing essential complexity isn't
clear. 3.7 the reason is not explained
clearly |
let's say --> too informal |
| 9691 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
13 |
/-10/. Lacking Content
(About 500 words). Met all other
requirements. |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 2 points off since the definition is incomplete 3.6 5 points
off since VB and Frontpage are examples for accidental complexity |
detailed --> change of verb tense because as X |
| 9729 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.3 2
points off since the graph is missing |
usually , X |
| 9823 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
2.3&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definitions are
incomplete 3.6 5 points off since Java is an example for accidental
complexity |
.) --> ). incorrectly result X |
| 9918 |
86 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
11 |
Only one source (Fishman). Primarily a summary of Fishman
article. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since the example is wrong |
lead for X |
| 9934 |
82 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
0 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Very descriptive. |
5 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 calculation is missing 3.2&3.3 each has 3 points off
since the definitions are not for essential /accidental complexity
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
|
| 9980 |
85 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
Lacking Content (Only included History of). Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since IDE is used to reduce accidental
complexity only |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|