Part 1 Part 2     Part 3    
ID-4 Total 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.2 Scoring Notes Part 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Scoring Notes - Parts 1 and 3 3.1 Notes
1026 20           5 15 /-10/ Extremely short, vague on all issues.                  
1161 75 2 16 6 2 4 15 10  /-10/.  Missing archival source.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the second chart has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are given Nevertheless --> wrong word
1370 97 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong constrain X   Essential takes requires X
1385 61 2 16 3 0 0 8 13 Missing HTML Tags <b><li></b><br>. (Almost entire content quoted) 3 4 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 3 points off since the summary chart isn't complete and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse isn't an example for essential complexity it frees X   like his X
1461 88 2 16 6 2 4 23 13 Links at top don't work. Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, specific functionality of Google other than searching).  Met all other requirements.  4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no corrrect specific example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level languages are mentioned and, --> no comma   literally --> avoid this word   argue X
1489 95 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Met all requirements. However, too many lists about XP. 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Java helps reduce accidental complexity isn't clear prefect X      goes on --> eliminate
1504 88 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 0 2 3 0 5 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and changebility are mentioned 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned so much … began X
1520 84 2 16 6 1 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  All of the information was present, just not separated well. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 2 --> use two
1691 99 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Very informative. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   in either productivity, in X
1701 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Informative, however, titles would have made it easier to follow. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
1862 83 2 16 4 1 4 25 15 Good. 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 points off since the calculation is wrong 3.5,3.6&3.7  all missing bad affect X
1997 79 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. Short. 5 4 0 4 3 0 5 3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off since no answer annoyances --> wrong word
2039 89 2 16 4 1 4 23 15 Lacking content (size). Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given Brooks X (missing ')
2047 97 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 3.6 3 points off because there are many types of pseudo code and it's not specified how it might address essential complexity. a magnitude --> leaves out "order of"  essence include X
2118 87 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing creating them X   Brook's X
2145 0           0 0 Did not submit.                  
2168 88 2 16 4 2 4 20 15 Met all requirements. Largely quoted text. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example for accidental complexity First off --> slangy
2171 90 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Cool pictures. 5 0 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since real time is used instead of initial estimate 2.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since IDE is an example for accidental complexity  
2210 99 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   because .. because --> awkward    essence X (s.b. essential)
2340 89 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/. Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   time of a start X
2446 90 2 16 5 2 4 23 15 Missing section headings. Lessons vague. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart  3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given essay title incorrect X   reasoning on X
2540 87 2 16 4 2 4 25 13 Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 0 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since Excel is an example of technology for accidental complexity past … in the past --> redundant
2574 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental complexity inherited X   accidental X (s.b. essential)
2595 93 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized 3.6 5 points off since Java and C++ are specific examples for accidental complexity  
2613 83 2 16 6 1 4 13 15 /-10/.  Lacking Content (What went wrong at IBM?).  Met all other requirements.      3 4 4 2 3 5 5 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and invisibility are mentioned the gains flow X   in which X
2614 91 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Cool banners. 5 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason why VB helps reducing accidental complexity isn't explained  
2712 84 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given in which X
2829 73 0 16 2 0 0 15 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.1 missing 1.3 4 points off since the logging entries are not categorized and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off since IDE is an example for accidental complexity  
2873 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 4 3.6 5 points off since Oracle isn't an example for essential complexity 3.7 1 point off since no specific high level language is mentioned base his X
2899 93 2 16 5 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Real time is used instead of initial estimation 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing is just that --> awkward
3045 54 2 16 6 1 4     Did not submit. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Java is an example for accidental complexity  
3049 87 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is different from the chart in 1.2 3.6&3.7 answers are missing describes … into X   complexity would be complexity --> unclear; use is
3079 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
3082 81 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/.  Lacking Content (System Size, Other features of Google, such as Gmail, etc...).  Met all other requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given a werewolves X   cutting down … increase X
3131 74 2 16 4 2 4 10 15  /-10/.  The text is almost entirely direct quotations. 3 4 2 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is missing 3.3 2 points off since the definition is partly correct 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given Cry X    Changeability is X
3133 33           20 13 Did not link website banner properly.  Lacking Content/Uninformative.  Met all other requirements.               part 1&3 are missing  
3184 95 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Did not describe specifics of the software system)  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 2 5 3.6 3 points off because it is not made clear what part of essential complexity is reduced by documentation.  
3196 87 2 16 6 2 4 15 13 /-10/ Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   there is bullets X    bullets. --> sloppy
3266 89 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Not organized with assignment sections. 5 0 4 4 3 0 5 3.2 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since Java or .NET are examples for accidental complexity  
3318 87 2 16 2 1 4 23 15 Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 4 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Word is an example for accidental complexity accidents X
3409 88 2 16 5 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6&3.7 answers are missing  
3452 88 2 16 4 0 4 23 15 Lacking content (Sections are vague).  Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off since no calculation 3.7 5 points off since no specific example is given Accidents of Software Engineering X
3466 88 2 16 5 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. Excellent! 3 4 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing  3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given accidence X   which or X
3579 84 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 0 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing  
3679 82 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Lacking content (lessons learned). Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since the specific example given "Lotus Notes" cannot reduce essential complexity Would be --> use is    Even by X
3789 84 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/ Met all requirements.  4 0 4 4 3 4 5 3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.6 1 point off for not clearly giving example as an example order words X
3829 0           0 0 Did not submit.                  
3845 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 3 points off since no explaination on why Java/c++ are examples for accidental complexity Brooks' points X
3850 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Great Web Design. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no technology is mentioned to reduce essential complexity.  namely, things like …; etc. --> awkward!
3885 94 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off because configuration management addresses accidental complexity. wherewolves X
3935 68 2 16 4 2 4 15 8 /-10/ Tags out of order <a><h4></a></h4>. Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. 4 4 2 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.3 2 points off since the definition isn't complete 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing aviodable --> avoided   be solved X
3993 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since Visio is an example for accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Word is an example for accidental complexity isn't explained complexity are X
4013 78 2 16 6 2 4 15 15  /-10/.  Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing discusses about X   are no X
4026 44 2 16 4 2 4 0 0 Did not submit. 4 0 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since the definitions are wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental complexity only in need to X
4035 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
4184 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Very descriptive. 5 4 4