| |
Part 1 |
Part 2 |
|
|
Part 3 |
|
|
| ID-4 |
Total |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.1 |
2.2 |
Scoring Notes Part 2 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
Scoring Notes - Parts 1 and
3 |
3.1 Notes |
| 1026 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
15 |
/-10/
Extremely short, vague on all issues. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1161 |
75 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
10 |
/-10/. Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the second chart has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since
no specific examples are given |
Nevertheless --> wrong word |
| 1370 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong |
constrain X Essential
takes requires X |
| 1385 |
61 |
2 |
16 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
13 |
Missing HTML Tags <b><li></b><br>.
(Almost entire content quoted) |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 3 points off since the summary chart isn't complete and the
graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.3 4 points off since the definition is
wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse isn't an example for essential
complexity |
it frees X like his X |
| 1461 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
13 |
Links
at top don't work. Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, specific functionality
of Google other than searching). Met
all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no corrrect specific example is mentioned
3.7 2 points off since no specific high level languages are mentioned |
and, --> no comma
literally --> avoid this word
argue X |
| 1489 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Met all requirements. However, too many lists about XP. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
3 |
3.7 2 points off since the reason why Java helps reduce
accidental complexity isn't clear |
prefect X goes on
--> eliminate |
| 1504 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.4 2 points
off since only complexity and changebility are mentioned 3.6 5 points off
since no specific example is mentioned |
so much … began X |
| 1520 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. All of the information
was present, just not separated well. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
2 --> use two |
| 1691 |
99 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Very informative. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
in either productivity, in X |
| 1701 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Informative, however, titles would have made it easier to follow. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 1862 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Good. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 points off
since the calculation is wrong 3.5,3.6&3.7 all missing |
bad affect X |
| 1997 |
79 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. Short. |
5 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off
since no answer |
annoyances --> wrong word |
| 2039 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking content (size). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate
3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given |
Brooks X (missing ') |
| 2047 |
97 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
3.6 3 points off because there are many types of pseudo code and
it's not specified how it might address essential complexity. |
a magnitude --> leaves out "order of" essence include X |
| 2118 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are
missing |
creating them X Brook's X |
| 2145 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2168 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Largely quoted text. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example
for accidental complexity |
First off --> slangy |
| 2171 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Cool pictures. |
5 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since real time is used instead of initial
estimate 2.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off
since IDE is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 2210 |
99 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
because .. because --> awkward essence X (s.b. essential) |
| 2340 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
time of a start X |
| 2446 |
90 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Missing section headings. Lessons vague. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.6 5 points off since
no specific example is given |
essay title incorrect X
reasoning on X |
| 2540 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
13 |
Missing 1 distinct webpage reference. Met all other requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off
since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since Excel is an example of
technology for accidental complexity |
past … in the past --> redundant |
| 2574 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental
complexity |
inherited X accidental X
(s.b. essential) |
| 2595 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized
3.6 5 points off since Java and C++ are specific examples for accidental
complexity |
|
| 2613 |
83 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Lacking Content (What went wrong at
IBM?). Met all other
requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the
initial estimate 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and invisibility are
mentioned |
the gains flow X in which
X |
| 2614 |
91 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Cool banners. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off
since no specific example is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason why VB
helps reducing accidental complexity isn't explained |
|
| 2712 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all
requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
in which X |
| 2829 |
73 |
0 |
16 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.1 missing 1.3 4 points off since the logging entries are not
categorized and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off
since IDE is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 2873 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
3.6 5 points off since Oracle isn't an example for essential
complexity 3.7 1 point off since no specific high level language is mentioned |
base his X |
| 2899 |
93 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Real time is
used instead of initial estimation 3.6 5 points off since the answer is
missing |
is just that --> awkward |
| 3045 |
54 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
|
|
Did not submit. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off
since Java is an example for accidental complexity |
|
| 3049 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is different from the
chart in 1.2 3.6&3.7 answers are missing |
describes … into X
complexity would be complexity --> unclear; use is |
| 3079 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 3082 |
81 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/. Lacking Content
(System Size, Other features of Google, such as Gmail, etc...). Met all other requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given |
a werewolves X cutting
down … increase X |
| 3131 |
74 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
10 |
15 |
/-10/. The text is almost entirely direct
quotations. |
3 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is missing 3.3 2 points
off since the definition is partly correct 3.6 5 points off since no specific
example is given |
Cry X Changeability is X |
| 3133 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
13 |
Did not link website banner properly. Lacking Content/Uninformative. Met all other requirements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
part 1&3 are missing |
|
| 3184 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Did not describe specifics of
the software system) Met all other
requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
3.6 3 points off because it is not made clear what part of
essential complexity is reduced by documentation. |
|
| 3196 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
13 |
/-10/ Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
there is bullets X
bullets. --> sloppy |
| 3266 |
89 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Not organized with assignment sections. |
5 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.2 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points
off since Java or .NET are examples for accidental complexity |
|
| 3318 |
87 |
2 |
16 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 4 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off
since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Word is an example for
accidental complexity |
accidents X |
| 3409 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the
summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6&3.7
answers are missing |
|
| 3452 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
23 |
15 |
Lacking content (Sections are vague). Met all other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off
since no calculation 3.7 5 points off since no specific example is given |
Accidents of Software Engineering X |
| 3466 |
88 |
2 |
16 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. Excellent! |
3 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the
summary chart 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example
is given |
accidence X which or X |
| 3579 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off
since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the
answers are missing |
|
| 3679 |
82 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
15 |
/-10/ Lacking content (lessons learned). Met all other
requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5 points off since the specific example given "Lotus
Notes" cannot reduce essential complexity |
Would be --> use is
Even by X |
| 3789 |
84 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/ Met all
requirements. |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.6 1 point off for not
clearly giving example as an example |
order words X |
| 3829 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3845 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 3 points
off since no explaination on why Java/c++ are examples for accidental
complexity |
Brooks' points X |
| 3850 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Great Web Design. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6
5 points off since no technology is mentioned to reduce essential
complexity. |
namely, things like …; etc. --> awkward! |
| 3885 |
94 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
3.6 5
points off because configuration management addresses accidental complexity. |
wherewolves X |
| 3935 |
68 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
8 |
/-10/ Tags out of order
<a><h4></a></h4>. Missing archival source. Met all
other requirements. |
4 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of
logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.3 2 points off since the definition
isn't complete 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are
missing |
aviodable --> avoided
be solved X |
| 3993 |
92 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
4 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
3.6 5 points off since Visio is an example for accidental
complexity 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Word is an example for
accidental complexity isn't explained |
complexity are X |
| 4013 |
78 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
15 |
15 |
/-10/. Met all requirements. |
3 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing |
discusses about X are no
X |
| 4026 |
44 |
2 |
16 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
Did not submit. |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2&3.3 each has
4 points off since the definitions are wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse
is an example for accidental complexity only |
in need to X |
| 4035 |
100 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements. |
5 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
|
|
| 4184 |
95 |
2 |
16 |
6 |
2 |
4 |
25 |
15 |
Met all requirements.
Very descriptive. |
5 |
4 |
4 |