Part 1 Part 2     Part 3    
ID-4 Total 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2.1 2.2 Scoring Notes Part 2 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 Scoring Notes - Parts 1 and 3 3.1 Notes
1026 20           5 15 /-10/ Extremely short, vague on all issues.                  
1161 75 2 16 6 2 4 15 10  /-10/.  Missing archival source.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the second chart has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are given Nevertheless --> wrong word
1370 97 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong constrain X   Essential takes requires X
1385 61 2 16 3 0 0 8 13 Missing HTML Tags <b><li></b><br>. (Almost entire content quoted) 3 4 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 3 points off since the summary chart isn't complete and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse isn't an example for essential complexity it frees X   like his X
1461 88 2 16 6 2 4 23 13 Links at top don't work. Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, specific functionality of Google other than searching).  Met all other requirements.  4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no corrrect specific example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level languages are mentioned and, --> no comma   literally --> avoid this word   argue X
1489 95 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Met all requirements. However, too many lists about XP. 4 4 4 4 3 5 3 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Java helps reduce accidental complexity isn't clear prefect X      goes on --> eliminate
1504 88 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 0 2 3 0 5 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and changebility are mentioned 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned so much … began X
1520 84 2 16 6 1 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  All of the information was present, just not separated well. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 2 --> use two
1691 99 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Very informative. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   in either productivity, in X
1701 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Informative, however, titles would have made it easier to follow. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
1862 83 2 16 4 1 4 25 15 Good. 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 points off since the calculation is wrong 3.5,3.6&3.7  all missing bad affect X
1997 79 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. Short. 5 4 0 4 3 0 5 3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6 5 points off since no answer annoyances --> wrong word
2039 89 2 16 4 1 4 23 15 Lacking content (size). Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given Brooks X (missing ')
2047 97 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 3 5 3.6 3 points off because there are many types of pseudo code and it's not specified how it might address essential complexity. a magnitude --> leaves out "order of"  essence include X
2118 87 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing creating them X   Brook's X
2145 0           0 0 Did not submit.                  
2168 88 2 16 4 2 4 20 15 Met all requirements. Largely quoted text. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example for accidental complexity First off --> slangy
2171 90 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Cool pictures. 5 0 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since real time is used instead of initial estimate 2.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since IDE is an example for accidental complexity  
2210 99 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   because .. because --> awkward    essence X (s.b. essential)
2340 89 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/. Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   time of a start X
2446 90 2 16 5 2 4 23 15 Missing section headings. Lessons vague. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart  3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given essay title incorrect X   reasoning on X
2540 87 2 16 4 2 4 25 13 Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 0 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since Excel is an example of technology for accidental complexity past … in the past --> redundant
2574 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental complexity inherited X   accidental X (s.b. essential)
2595 93 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the logging entries are not categorized 3.6 5 points off since Java and C++ are specific examples for accidental complexity  
2613 83 2 16 6 1 4 13 15 /-10/.  Lacking Content (What went wrong at IBM?).  Met all other requirements.      3 4 4 2 3 5 5 1.4 1 point off since the real time is used instead of the initial estimate 3.4 2 points off since only complexity and invisibility are mentioned the gains flow X   in which X
2614 91 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Cool banners. 5 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason why VB helps reducing accidental complexity isn't explained  
2712 84 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given in which X
2829 73 0 16 2 0 0 15 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.1 missing 1.3 4 points off since the logging entries are not categorized and the graph is missing 1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off since IDE is an example for accidental complexity  
2873 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 4 3.6 5 points off since Oracle isn't an example for essential complexity 3.7 1 point off since no specific high level language is mentioned base his X
2899 93 2 16 5 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Real time is used instead of initial estimation 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing is just that --> awkward
3045 54 2 16 6 1 4     Did not submit. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Java is an example for accidental complexity  
3049 87 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is different from the chart in 1.2 3.6&3.7 answers are missing describes … into X   complexity would be complexity --> unclear; use is
3079 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
3082 81 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/.  Lacking Content (System Size, Other features of Google, such as Gmail, etc...).  Met all other requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given a werewolves X   cutting down … increase X
3131 74 2 16 4 2 4 10 15  /-10/.  The text is almost entirely direct quotations. 3 4 2 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the summary chart is missing 3.3 2 points off since the definition is partly correct 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given Cry X    Changeability is X
3133 33           20 13 Did not link website banner properly.  Lacking Content/Uninformative.  Met all other requirements.               part 1&3 are missing  
3184 95 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Did not describe specifics of the software system)  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 2 5 3.6 3 points off because it is not made clear what part of essential complexity is reduced by documentation.  
3196 87 2 16 6 2 4 15 13 /-10/ Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   there is bullets X    bullets. --> sloppy
3266 89 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Not organized with assignment sections. 5 0 4 4 3 0 5 3.2 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since Java or .NET are examples for accidental complexity  
3318 87 2 16 2 1 4 23 15 Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 4 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since Word is an example for accidental complexity accidents X
3409 88 2 16 5 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6&3.7 answers are missing  
3452 88 2 16 4 0 4 23 15 Lacking content (Sections are vague).  Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off since no calculation 3.7 5 points off since no specific example is given Accidents of Software Engineering X
3466 88 2 16 5 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. Excellent! 3 4 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing  3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given accidence X   which or X
3579 84 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 0 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing  
3679 82 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Lacking content (lessons learned). Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since the specific example given "Lotus Notes" cannot reduce essential complexity Would be --> use is    Even by X
3789 84 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/ Met all requirements.  4 0 4 4 3 4 5 3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.6 1 point off for not clearly giving example as an example order words X
3829 0           0 0 Did not submit.                  
3845 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 3 points off since no explaination on why Java/c++ are examples for accidental complexity Brooks' points X
3850 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Great Web Design. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no technology is mentioned to reduce essential complexity.  namely, things like …; etc. --> awkward!
3885 94 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off because configuration management addresses accidental complexity. wherewolves X
3935 68 2 16 4 2 4 15 8 /-10/ Tags out of order <a><h4></a></h4>. Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. 4 4 2 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different number of logging entries from the one in 1.2 3.3 2 points off since the definition isn't complete 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing aviodable --> avoided   be solved X
3993 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since Visio is an example for accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Word is an example for accidental complexity isn't explained complexity are X
4013 78 2 16 6 2 4 15 15  /-10/.  Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing discusses about X   are no X
4026 44 2 16 4 2 4 0 0 Did not submit. 4 0 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since the definitions are wrong 3.6 5 points off since Eclipse is an example for accidental complexity only in need to X
4035 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
4184 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Very descriptive. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since high level language isn't an example for essential complexity  
4197 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 13 Links broken (many go to external pages). Otherwise, excellent! 5 4 4 1 3 5 5 3.4 3 points off since only complexity is mentioned   
4241 91 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no specifc example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since the reason why IDE helps reducing accidental complexity isn't explained properties is X   it's X
4294 98 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 5 5   project X   the unclear X
4378 86 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 0 4 3 0 3 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.3 4 points off since the definition is missing 3.6 5 points off since OO is an example for accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level language is mentioned has devoted X
4439 97 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3.6&3.7 each has 1 point off since the reasons are not clearly explained A programmer … may differ --> ???   which has X
4465 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since Lotus isn't an example for essential complexity 2 --> use "two"
4518 96 2 16 6 2 4 23 13 HTML Errors. Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5   quips --> wrong word
4582 91 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since Java is a specific example for accidental complexity Bullter X   software are X
4656 78 2 16 6 1 4 15 13 /-10/ Links are difficult to see on blue background, odd characters are present. 3 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing 3.7 2 points off since no specific high level language is mentioned mentions that X   implement for X
4725 94 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since expert system isn't an example for essential complexity. Expert system may help reducing programming error which is accecidental instead of essential Brooks X (missing ')
4744 90 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 2 1.3 2 ponts off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since the examples are all used for accidental complexity 3.7 2 points off since answer is vague and not specific  
4841L 83 2 16 6 2 4 25 13 Link within History portion didn't work.  Met all other requirements. 4 2 2 4 3 0 0 3.2 2 points off since the definition is vague 3.3 2 points off since the definition is partly correct 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are mentioned idea's X
4841V 0           0 0 Did not submit.                  
4895 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 13 Links broken (all to external pages); black text on a dark background. Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since Adobe Acrobat Reader isn't a specific example for essential complexity reason to, true to X
4909 93 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since Microsoft’s Visual Studio isn't an example for essential complexity  
5163 77 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  Did not format tables properly in html.  3 4 0 4 3 5 0 3.3 4 points off since the difinition is missing 3.7 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned Brooks gives  X      irreducible  X
5185 52 2 16 6 0 4 5 8 /-10/ Lacking content, only addresses description. No section headings, no archive citation. 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 1.4 2 points off since the calculation is missing 3.4 4 points off since the 4 reasons are not given 3.5 3 points off since no opinion is seen 3.6&3.7 each has 4 points off since no specific examples are given Brook.  Argues X  years times X
5235 79 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/ Good. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6 5 points off since Visio isn't an example for essential complexity 3.7 5 points off since the answer is missing persons X
5279 91 2 16 5 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. Artistic! 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason why Java or IDE is an example for accidental complexity isn't explained agreeable --> wrong word  lay X (s.b. slay)
5315 96 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3.6 2 points off since no description of why rapid prototyping and incremental development reduce essential complexity   3.7 2 points off since no description of what features of Eclipse reduce accidental complexity   
5426 52 2 16 6 0 4 0 0 Did not submit. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 2 points off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off no specific example is mentioned Brook's X  
5476 91 2 16 6 2 4 25 13 HTML Errors. Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since high level language is an example for accidental complexity Brook  X   separate X
5512 89 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are mentioned. CVS is used to reduce accidental complexity accidental != unplanned   that is X
5680 82 2 16 5 1 4 13 15 /-10/.  Used a lot quotes.  Link from index did not work.  Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 1 3 5 5 1.3 3 points off since "total" is missing from the summary chart 1.4 1 point off since the initial estimate isn't used 3.5 3 points off since only complexity is mentioned addresses that X
5717 82 2 16 4 2 0 23 15 Met all requirements. However, mainly lists and large quotes. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.5 missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing  
5724 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Good. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no answer to this question  
5792 78 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  Awesome logos. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing programming as a human X  complexity inherited X
5812 85 2 16 5 2 4 23 13 Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Lacking Content (Causes of success portion was vague, as was the Lessons Learned section). 4 0 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing from the summary chart 3.2 4 points off since the definition is incorrect 3.6 5 points off since Visio isn't a specific example for essential complexity peoples X (missing ')
5832 59 2 16 6 2 4 0 0  /-10/.  Much of the text is direct quotations, with source given, but no quotation marks. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   Brooks, then --> drop comma   that Brooks gives X
6031 85 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  Made an effort to paraphrase, and put things into own words. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since the specific example given is wrong  
6033 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned on order X   in result by X
6209 96 2 16 4 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 1.3 take 2 points off since the chart in 1.3 has different logging entries from the one in 1.2            1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial estimate removed from all repetition X
6327 88 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. Nice design. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.4 1 point off since calculation is wrong. The time went-off is divided by the actual time instead of initial estimation. 3.6 5 points off. No answer to this question 3.7 5 points off. No answer to this question complexity is problems X
6398 81 2 16 6 2 4 15 13 /-10/ Some HTML links don't work. Met all other requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since the answer is wrong complexity that are X    refers these X
6432 73 2 16 4 2 0 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  This was very informative. 4 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.5 4 points off since the discussion is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing which designed X
6455 83 2 16 4 0 4 15 15 Lacking Content, particularly the causes and lessons learned. Met all other requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 5 4 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 2 points off since the calculation is missing 3.6 I'm not sure whether Jcreator is an example. From the description, Jcreator helps students visualize how a Java program works. I don't think that's essential complexity 3.7 1 point off since the reason is incomplete complexity in the other hand is X   long time than X
6491 89 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 2 2 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.2&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definitions are incomplete 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing time advances --> wrong word  complexity are X
6608 78 2 16 6 0 4 13 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. Some large quoted text. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.4 2 points off since calculation is missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since no commercial tool is mentioned as an example of high level languages becoming huge problems X
6745 88 2 16 6 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Last two sections mainly bulleted text. Met other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5    
6849 93 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 1 0 5 3.5 2 points off since the author's opinion isn't clear 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given  
6923 89 2 16 6 1 4 23 15 Lacking Content (Need to be more specific as to what went wrong).  Great web design.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 1 1 1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial estimate 3.6 4 points off since no specific example of technology for essential complexity is mentioned 3.7 4 points off. The same reason as 3.6  
7092 80 2 16 6 1 4 23 10 Well designed.  Not very informative (i.e.  What is the PageRank system?).  Missing archival source.  Met all other requirements. 4 4 3 4 3 0 0 1.4 wrong calculation. Actual time is used instead of initial estimate 3.2 1 point off since the understanding of "high level languages, time-sharing and unified programming environment" is wrong 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing those are Aristotle's words --> ??!!   Brookes X   4 --> use four    essences  --> wrong word   therefore money --> awkward
7202 79 2 13 4 2 4 15 15  /-10/.  Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.2 3 points off since the logging entries are not clear 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off because configuration management addresses accidental complexity. is hard X
7272 86 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Good. 4 0 2 4 3 3 0 3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.3 2 points off since the definition is incomplete 3.62 points off since it's not explained why it helps reduce essential complexity 3.7 5 points off since the answer is missing exists four X   inadvertently --> wrong word
7293 90 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content (System Size, Description of IBM System).  Met all other requirements. 4 4 2 4 3 0 5 3.3 2 points off since the definition is vague. 3.6 5 points off since the given example isn't for essential complexity programs must lie X   that.  --> sloppy
7400 79 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content (About 500 words).  Met all other requirements. 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since no definitions 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no answers essence X (s.b. plural)
7409 86 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 0 4 3 0 0 3.3 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since Excel is an example for accidental complexity 3.7 5 points off since the answer is missing  
7520 75 2 16 6 2 4 12 15 /-10/.  Most of the website was quoted… did not take time to rephrase.  Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since the answers are missing governing X    visions… lies X
7692 90 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing  
7785 93 2 16 0 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 1.3 6 points off since the anlaysis is totally wrong Brooks X (missing ')
7857 83 2 16 6 2 4 23 10 Missing archival source. Met all other requirements. Short. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are mentioned.   
7862 90 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 3.6 5 points off since wrong examples are given 3.7 5 points off since the answer is missing  
7913 96 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.7 1 point off since a specific example of source control tools isn't given  ease of change X
8087 99 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. Nice design. However, links to left don't work. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   underlying, abstract X
8154 94 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given essence difficulties X
8274 83 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content (What about the software?  System Size?).  Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 0 3 0 0 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing Brook's X  
8292 84 2 16 4 2 4 20 13 Lacking Content (all sections are vague).  Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since the given example is wrong 3.7 2 points off since no commercial tool is mentioned  
8300 86 0 16 6 0 0 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.1,1.4&1.5 missing 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned complexities deals X
8335 92 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since high level languages are for accidental complexity subjects … deals X
8341 42 2 16 4 0 0 0 0 Did not submit. 4 4 0 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4&1. 5 are missing 3.3 4 points off since no definition is found 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is given may cause may X
8455 59 2 16 6 2 4 0 0 Some text is directly quoted without quotation marks; in first paragraph citation is incorrect. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5   IBM's X
8457 65 2 0 0 0 0 23 15 Met all requirements. However, used large paragraph-sized quotes.  5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 all missing 3.6 5 points off since Visual Studio is an example for accidental complexity such as … etc.--> conflicting
8462 82 2 13 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 0 4 4 3 0 0 1.2&1.3 3 points off since the log entries are not categorized. 3.2 4 points off. The definition is wrong. Essential complexity is not caused by implementation  3.6 5 points off. Eclipse is used to reduce accidental complexity instead of essential complexity 3.7 5 points off. Windlx is a tool to speed up prototype, so it's used to reduce essential complexity being X
8510 80 2 16 5 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 0 0 4 3 0 0 1.3 1 point off since "total" is missing in the summary chart 3.2 4 points off since no definition 3.3 4 points off since the definition is wrong 3.6&3.7 each has 5 pooints off since no specific examples are mentioned program are X
8531 92 2 16 6 1 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 3 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong. Initial esitmation is not used. 3.6 5 points off since LabView is mentioned to reduce invisibility and is used to reduce ambiguity during implemetation, so it's for accidental complexity reason believe X  big on --> awkward   much like --> you mean unlike    near impossible  --> too dang informal X
8554 87 2 16 4 2 4 15 15 /-10/.  Met all requirements.  5 4 4 4 3 4 5 1.3 2 points off since the category "research" is missing from the column graph   3.6 the reason why Rational Unified Process helps reducing essential complexity isn't clearly explained.   
8599 79 2 16 6 0 4 23 15 Lacking content (what was the size, causes of success or failure). Met all other requirements. 5 0 0 0 3 0 5 1.4 calculation is wrong 3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since the definitions are missing 3.4 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.6 5 points off since C# is an example for accidental complexity  
8668 84 0 16 5 2 4 23 15 Lacking Content. Met all other requirements. 3 2 2 4 3 0 5 1.1 2 points off since initial estimation is missing 1.3 1 point off since the graph is wrong 3.2&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definitions are incomplete 3.6 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned stated X   complicity  X
8725 87 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 2 4 3 0 0 3.3 2 points off since the definition isn't complete 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing The is no X  
8779 86 2 16 4 2 4 25 13 HTML Errors (white text on white background). Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 0 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific examples are given  
8782 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 13 Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Met all other requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since CVS is an example for accidental complexity want --> wrong word (need)  the when X
8989 100 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 5 5   language itself --> unnec.
9074 85 2 16 4 1 4 23 10 Missing archival source.  Lacking Content (i.e. System Size, Lessons Learned).  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing  
9190 78 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Great Web Design. 3 0 0 4 3 0 0 1.3 take 2 points off since the graph is missing  3.2&3.3 each has 4 points off since no definition for essential and accidental complexity 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since no specific example is mentioned bullets is X  that silver bullets X  giving out --> awkward    anyone that --> use who
9199 96 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 4 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.7 1 point off since a specific example of high level languages isn't given  providence X (s.b. provenance)
9239 78 2 16 4 2 4 13 15 /-10/ Met all requirements. Many large quotes. 4 2 0 4 2 5 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.2 2 points off since the definition is partially correct 3.3 4 points off since the answer is missing 3.5 1 point off since the reason isn't explained  effect's  X   we can … you had --> don't switch pronoun
9390 93 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since PowerPoint isn't an example for essential complexity  
9486 98 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 3 5 3.6 2 points off since why UML is an example for essential complexity isn't explained  
9491 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Great schematic. 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3.6 5 points off since no specifc example is mentioned 3.7 2 points off since the reason why high level languages help reducing accidental complexity isn't explained magnitude --> left out order of  This does not mean X (missing "not")
9498 95 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since flow chart is used to reduce ambiguity during implemetation, so it's for accidental complexity Brooks talks … --> too long a sentence
9503 93 2 16 6 2 4 23 15 Lack of Content (System Size, Successes/Failures, etc…).  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since the answer is missing  
9530 87 2 16 3 1 4 25 13 Missing 1 distinct webpage reference.  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 3 1.3 3 points off since "total" is mising in the summary chart and the graph is missing 1.4 1 point off since the calculation is wrong 3.6 5 points off since no exmaple is given 3.7 2 points off since the reason isn't explained  
9671 92 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 5 2 2 4 3 3 3 3.2&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definition is vague. 3.6 the reason why unit testing helps reducing essential complexity isn't clear.  3.7 the reason is not explained clearly let's say --> too informal
9691 78 2 16 6 2 4 13 13 /-10/.  Lacking Content (About 500 words).  Met all other requirements. 4 4 2 4 3 0 5 3.3 2 points off since the definition is incomplete 3.6 5 points off since VB and Frontpage are examples for accidental complexity detailed --> change of verb tense    because as X
9729 97 2 16 4 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 4 4 4 3 5 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing  usually , X
9823 90 2 16 6 2 4 25 15 Met all requirements. 4 2 2 4 3 0 5 2.3&3.3 each has 2 points off since the definitions are incomplete 3.6 5 points off since Java is an example for accidental complexity .)  --> ).   incorrectly result X
9918 86 2 16 4 2 4 23 11 Only one source (Fishman). Primarily a summary of Fishman article. 4 4 4 4 3 0 5 1.3 2 points off since the graph is missing 3.6 5 points off since the example is wrong lead for X
9934 82 2 16 6 0 4 25 15 Met all requirements.  Very descriptive. 5 1 1 4 3 0 0 1.4 calculation is missing 3.2&3.3 each has 3 points off since the definitions are not for essential /accidental complexity 3.6&3.7 each has 5 points off since answers are missing  
9980 85 2 16 6 2 4 15 15 Lacking Content (Only included History of).  Met all other requirements. 5 4 4 4 3 0 5 3.6 5 points off since IDE is used to reduce accidental complexity only