WEBDAV Working Group J. Slein, Xerox INTERNET DRAFT J. Davis, Xerox G. Clemm, Rational C. Fay, FileNet E.J. Whitehead Jr., UC Irvine A. Babich, FileNet January 28, 1999 Expires July 28, 1999 WebDAV Advanced Collections Protocol Status of this Memo This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or made obsolete by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". To view the entire list of current Internet-Drafts, please check the "1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), ftp.nordu.net (Northern Europe), ftp.nis.garr.it (Southern Europe),munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ftp.ietf.org (US EastCoast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast). Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments to the Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) working group at , which may be joined by sending a message with subject "subscribe" to . Discussions of the WEBDAV working group are archived at URL: . Abstract The base WebDAV protocol [WebDAV] provides basic support for collections. It defines a MKCOL method for creating collections and specifies how other HTTP and WebDAV methods interact with collections. It supports internal members of collections, which it defines as URIs that are immediately relative to the URI of the collection. Many applications, however, need more powerful collections. There are two areas in particular where more powerful functionality is often needed: referential resources and ordering. This draft specifies extensions to the base WebDAV protocol to support these more powerful collections. Table of Contents 1 Notational Conventions 3 2 Terminology 3 3 Introduction 4 Slein et al. Page 1 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 4 Referential Resources 5 4.1 Scope 5 4.2 Overview 6 4.3 Creating Referential Resources 7 4.3.1 The MKREF Method 7 4.3.2 Status Codes 8 4.3.3 Example 9 4.4 Deleting, Copying, and Moving Referential Resources 9 4.5 Listing Referential Members of a Collection 9 4.6 Locking Referential Resources 10 4.7 Other WebDAV Operations on Redirect Referential Resources 11 4.8 Other WebDAV Operations on Direct Referential Resources 12 4.9 HTTP Operations on Redirect Referential Resources 13 4.10 HTTP Operations on Direct Referential Resources 14 4.11 Operations on Targets of Referential Resources 14 4.12 Discovering a Target’s References 14 4.13 Behavior of Dangling Direct References 15 4.14 Chains of Direct References 17 4.15 Summary of Referencing Headers Required in Responses 17 5 Ordered Collections 18 5.1 Overview 19 5.2 Creating an Ordered Collection 19 5.2.1 Overview 19 5.2.2 Status Codes 20 5.2.3 Example 20 5.3 Setting the Position of a Collection Member 20 5.3.1 Overview 20 5.3.2 Status Codes 20 5.3.3 Examples 21 5.4 Changing the Semantics of a Collection Ordering 21 5.5 Changing the Position of a Collection Member 21 5.5.1 The ORDERPATCH Method 21 5.5.2 Status Codes 22 5.5.3 Example 22 5.5.4 Design Rationale 23 6 New Headers 24 6.1 Ref-Target Entity Header 24 6.2 Ref-Type Entity Header 24 6.3 Ref-Integrity Request Header 25 6.4 No-Passthrough Request Header 25 6.5 Ordered Entity Header 26 6.6 Position Request Header 26 7 New Properties 27 7.1 reftarget Property 27 7.2 refintegrity Property 27 7.3 reftype Property 27 7.4 references Property 27 7.5 orderingtype Property 28 8 New XML Elements 28 8.1 reference XML Element 28 8.2 direct XML Element 28 8.3 redirect XML Element 28 8.4 weak XML Element 29 8.5 location XML Element 29 8.6 unordered XML Element 29 Slein et al. Page 2 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 8.7 custom XML Element 29 8.8 order XML Element 29 8.9 ordermember XML Element 30 8.10 position XML Element 30 8.11 first XML Element 30 8.12 last XML Element 30 8.13 before XML Element 31 8.14 after XML Element 31 9 Extensions to the DAV:multistatus XML Element 31 10 Capability Discovery 31 10.1 Using OPTIONS 31 10.2 Example 32 11 Dependencies on Other Specifications 32 12 Security Considerations 32 12.1 Redirect Loops 32 12.2 References and Denial of Service 33 12.3 Maintaining Referential Integrity May Reveal Private Locations 33 12.4 DAV:references and Denial of Service 33 12.5 DAV:references and Malicious Deletion of Resources 33 12.6 Malicious Modifications of Ordering 33 12.7 Denial of Service and DAV:orderingtype 33 13 Internationalization Considerations 33 14 IANA Considerations 34 15 Copyright 34 16 Intellectual Property 34 17 Acknowledgements 34 18 References 34 19 Authors' Addresses 35 20 Appendices 35 20.1 Appendix 1 - Extensions to the WebDAV Document Type Definition 35 1 Notational Conventions Since this document describes a set of extensions to the HTTP/1.1 protocol, the augmented BNF used here to describe protocol elements is exactly the same as described in Section 2.1 of [HTTP]. Since this augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in Section 2.2 of [HTTP], these rules apply to this document as well. The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 2 Terminology The terminology used here follows and extends that in the base WebDAV protocol specification [WebDAV]. Collection A resource that contains a set of URIs, termed member URIs, which identify member resources Member URI A URI which is a member of the set of URIs contained by a collection Slein et al. Page 3 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 Referential Resource (or Reference) A resource that has no body of its own (though it does have properties), but rather is a reference to another resource Ordinary Resource A resource that is not a reference to another resource Target Resource The resource referenced by a referential resource Direct Reference A reference that is resolved by the server without any client action, giving the client the illusion that it is operating directly on the target resource Redirect Reference A reference that requires client action before it can be resolved, so that the client is aware that a reference is mediating between it and the target resource Strong Reference A reference whose referential integrity is enforced by the server Weak Reference A reference whose referential integrity is not enforced by the server Referential Integrity The integrity of a reference is preserved as long as it points to the same resource it pointed to when it was created. Its integrity may be destroyed if the target resource is moved without updating the reference to reflect its new location, or if the target resource is deleted. 3 Introduction The simple collections that the base WebDAV specification supports are powerful enough to be widely useful. They provide for the hierarchical organization of resources, with mechanisms for creating and deleting collections, copying and moving them, locking them, adding members to them and removing members from them, and getting listings of their members. Delete, copy, move, list, and lock operations can be applied recursively, so that a client can operate on whole hierarchies with a single request. Many applications, however, need more powerful collections. There are two areas in particular where more powerful functionality is often needed: references and ordering. References make it possible for many collections, on the same or different servers, to share the same resource. Because the collections share the resource by referencing it, only one physical copy of the resource need exist, and any changes made in the resource are visible from all the collections that reference it. Slein et al. Page 4 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 It is useful for many applications to be able to impose an ordering on a collection. Orderings may be based on property values, but they may be completely independent of any properties on the resources identified by the collection’s member URIs. Orderings based on properties can be obtained using a search protocol [DASL], but orderings not based on properties need some other mechanism. Since these two areas are independent of each other, servers may elect to comply with the Referential Resources section of this specification or with the Ordered Collections section or both. A server that supports referencing MUST support redirect references, and MAY support direct references. A server MUST advertise its compliance with particular parts of this specification through its response to an OPTIONS request, as specified in Section 10 below. 4 Referential Resources 4.1 Scope [CollReq] distinguishes between "weak" references and "strong" references, and also between "redirect" references and "direct" references. This specification supports weak references, direct references, and redirect references, and is designed so that it can be extended to support strong references in the future. Strong references are references whose integrity is enforced by the server; weak references are those whose integrity is not enforced by the server. Strong references and weak references are both useful in different contexts. Some applications cannot tolerate broken links. A software development application, for example, must be able to rely on the integrity of references to component modules. Such applications must be able to request strong references. Other applications may want to reference target resources on multiple servers, where referential integrity cannot be enforced, and may be less concerned about possible broken references. Several considerations led to the decision not to support strong references in the current specification. First, there are many possible policies that applications and services might use in enforcing referential integrity. Some examples are: o Delete strong references when their targets are deleted. o Decline to delete targets of strong references. o Notify strong references when their targets have been deleted. o Replace strong references with copies of their targets before deleting the targets. There appears to be no common practice in this area. Moreover, some of the policies have significant security risks. o Moving a target of strong references could be a security risk to the owner of the target by revealing secret locations on the target's server. o A strong reference could be a security risk to the owner of the Slein et al. Page 5 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 reference by revealing secret locations on his server. o The presence of strong references to resources on a server could make it impossible to reclaim space on that server by moving or deleting those target resources. These considerations together led to the decision not to support strong references in the short term. 4.2 Overview A referential resource is a resource that has no body of its own, but instead references another resource. The resource it references may have a URI in the same collection as the reference, or in any other collection. This target resource may be a collection or a simple resource or another reference, or any other sort of resource that may be defined in the future. A resource may be the target of any number of referential resources. To make it possible to distinguish references from ordinary resources, a new value of the DAV:resourcetype property is defined here. The DAV:resourcetype property of all references MUST have the value DAV:reference. Redirect references are references that require action by the client before they can be resolved. They are simple for servers to implement, straightforward for clients to use, and have only limited security implications. Any server that complies with WebDAV referencing MUST provide redirect references. If the client is aware that it is operating on a redirect reference, it can resolve the reference by retrieving the reference’s DAV:reftarget property, whose value is the URI of the target resource. It can then submit requests to the target resource. Otherwise, the client submits a request to the redirect reference. For most operations, the response is a 302 (Moved Temporarily), accompanied by the Ref-Type header with the value "DAV:redirect" and the Location header with the URI of the target resource. The client can then resubmit the request to the URI of the target resource. A few operations, those that affect membership in a collection rather than the state of the target resource, are exceptions to this general behavior. At present, the operations that fall into this category are DELETE, MOVE, and COPY. These operations are applied to the reference itself and do not result in a 302 response. Direct references, in contrast, are resolved automatically by the server. They give the client the illusion that it is operating directly on the target resource. These references are more complex for the server to implement, and raise additional security issues. Consequently, servers are not required to provide direct references in order to be compliant with WebDAV referencing. The default behavior of a direct reference is to apply most operations directly to its target, so that the client is not aware that a reference is mediating between it and the target resource. The exceptions are operations that affect membership in a collection rather than the state of the target resource. At present, the operations that fall into this Slein et al. Page 6 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 category are DELETE, MOVE, and COPY. These operations are applied to the reference itself rather than to its target, so that only the collection containing the reference is affected. The No-Passthrough request header is also provided, to force an operation to be applied to the reference itself rather than its target. It can be used with most requests to direct or redirect references. This header is particularly useful with PROPFIND, to allow clients to view the reference’s own properties. Ideally, non-referencing clients should be able to use both direct and redirect references. This goal is more difficult to meet for redirect references, since client action is required to resolve them. The strategy of having redirect references respond to most requests with a 302 (Moved Temporarily), accompanied by the URI of the target resource in the Location header, fulfills this goal in most cases. LOCK requests are the most significant exception, where we have been unable to support non-referencing clients. To distinguish between direct and redirect references, a new DAV:reftype property is defined, with the values DAV:direct and DAV:redirect. Every reference MUST have the DAV:reftype property. The DAV:reftype property of a direct reference MUST have the value DAV:direct. The DAV:reftype property of a redirect reference MUST have the value DAV:redirect. Every reference MUST have the DAV:reftarget property, whose value is the URI of the reference’s target resource. Although strong references are not currently supported, a new DAV:refintegrity property is defined in anticipation of future support for strong references. DAV:refintegrity will allow clients to distinguish between weak and strong references. All references MUST have this property. Although the only currently defined for DAV:refintegrity is DAV:weak, other values may be defined in the future, and servers MAY use extension values to identify their policy for enforcing referential integrity for that resource. 4.3 Creating Referential Resources 4.3.1 The MKREF Method Referential resources are created using the MKREF method. The request- URI of the MKREF request identifies the resource to be created. The required Ref-Target header contains the URI of the target resource. An optional Ref-Integrity request header is defined below, primarily for future support for strong references. The only values currently defined for this header are "do-not-enforce" and "enforce", although other values may be used by private agreement. If a server receives the value "do-not-enforce", it MUST NOT enforce referential integrity for the reference being created. If a server receives the value "enforce", it MUST enforce referential integrity for the reference being created, but is free to follow any policy it chooses for enforcing referential integrity. If the Ref-Integrity header is not used with a MKREF request, the server MAY enforce referential integrity, but is not Slein et al. Page 7 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 required to do so, and if it does enforce referential integrity, it may do so according to any policy it likes. Clients and servers may use other values of Ref-Integrity by private agreement, but if a server receives a value it does not understand, it MUST fail the request. An optional Ref-Type general header is defined below, with values "DAV:direct" and "DAV:redirect". The default value is "DAV:redirect" if the header is not present. An optional Position request header supports ordered collections by allowing the client creating a reference to specify where the new member is to be placed in the collection's ordering. (This header can also be used with any other method that adds a member to a collection, to specify its position in the collection ordering.) When a server processes a MKREF request, it MUST set the DAV:resourcetype property (defined in [WebDAV]) of the new resource to be DAV:reference. When a server processes a MKREF request, it MUST set the DAV:reftarget property to the URI of the target resource. When a server processes a MKREF request, it MUST set the DAV:reftype property based on the value of the Ref-Type header. When a server processes a MKREF request, it MUST set the DAV:refintegrity property to "DAV:weak" if it is not enforcing referential integrity for the newly-created reference. If it is enforcing referential integrity for the new reference, it MAY set the value of DAV:refintegrity to an extension value identifying its enforcement policy. The client MUST NOT send any content with the MKREF request, and so MUST NOT use the Content-Length or Transfer-Encoding headers. (See [HTTP].) If a MKREF request has a request-URI that identifies an existing resource, the request MUST fail. This behavior is analogous to the behavior of the MKCOL method [WebDAV]. 4.3.2 Status Codes Servers MUST use the HTTP/1.1 status codes as defined in [HTTP]. Some likely client errors for MKREF include: 400 (Bad Request): The client attempted to send content with the request, or set an invalid value for the Ref-Target, Ref-Integrity, Ref- Type, or Position header. 405 (Method Not Allowed): A resource already exists at the request-URI. 409 (Conflict): Several conditions may produce this response. There may be no resource at the location specified in Ref-Target, on a server that prohibits dangling references. The request may be attempting to create the reference in a collection that does not exist. The request may be attempting to position the reference before or after a resource that is Slein et al. Page 8 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 not in the collection, or before or after itself. The request may be attempting to position the reference in an unordered collection. 4.3.3 Example Request: MKREF /~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref HTTP/1.1 HOST: www.ics.uci.edu Ref-Target: Response: HTTP/1.1 201 Created This request resulted in the creation of a new referential resource at www.ics.uci.edu/~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref, which points to the resource identified by the Ref-Target header. Its DAV:resourcetype property is set to DAV:reference. Its DAV:reftarget property is set to the URI of its target resource. Its DAV:refintegrity property is set to the default value of DAV:weak. Its DAV:reftype property is set to the default value of DAV:redirect. 4.4 Deleting, Copying, and Moving Referential Resources The DELETE method should be used to delete referential resources. For both direct and redirect references, DELETE affects the reference itself, and not its target. A MOVE operation on a referential resource moves the referential resource to a different location, but has no effect on the location of its target. The DAV:reftarget property is unchanged after a MOVE. A COPY operation on a referential resource copies the referential resource, not its target resource, to another location. The DAV:reftarget property of the destination resource is the same as the DAV:reftarget of the source resource. 4.5 Listing Referential Members of a Collection A URI of a reference can be a member of a collection just as the URI of an ordinary resource can. A listing of members of a collection shows all of the URIs in the collection, whether they identify references or ordinary resources. That is, a WebDAV PROPFIND request on a collection resource with Depth = 1 or infinity MUST return a response XML element for each URI in the collection, whether it identifies an ordinary resource or a referential resource. For each direct reference, the properties returned by the PROPFIND are the properties of the target resource unless the No-Passthrough header is included with the PROPFIND request. For each redirect reference, the response element contains a 302 (Moved Temporarily) status code unless the No-Passthrough header is included with the PROPFIND request. The DAV:location element and the DAV:reftype Slein et al. Page 9 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 property are included with the 302 status code, extending the syntax of the DAV:response element that was defined in [WebDAV] as described in Section 9 below. A referencing client can tell from the DAV:reftype element that the collection contains a redirect reference. The DAV:location element contains the URI of the target resource. A referencing client can either use the DAV:location element to retrieve the properties of the target resource or can submit a PROPFIND to the redirect reference with the No-Passthrough header to retrieve its properties. The DAV:location element is expected to be defined in a future revision of [WebDAV], at which time non-referencing clients will also be able to use the response to retrieve the properties of the target resource. Example: . . . If Depth = infinity in the PROPFIND request, the server MUST NOT follow redirect references into any collections to which they may refer. If Depth = infinity in the PROPFIND request, the server MUST follow direct references into any collections to which they may refer unless the No-Passthrough header is used with the request. That is, if the target resource is a collection, the server MUST list the members of that collection. The No-Passthrough header may be used with a PROPFIND request on a collection. If the No-Passthrough header is present, then the properties of the references in the collection are returned. The No- Passthrough header prevents any 302 (Moved Temporarily) status codes from being returned for redirect references, and it prevents direct references from passing the request through to their target resources. In addition, it prevents the server from following direct references to collections into their target collections for PROPFIND requests with Depth = infinity. 4.6 Locking Referential Resources Ideally, a LOCK on a reference should lock both the reference and its target resource. The owner of an exclusive write lock, for example, would be surprised if anyone else could modify the content of the target resource while he held the lock. He would also be surprised if anyone else could delete the reference to it, or replace the reference with one pointing to a different target. For direct references, it is possible to provide this intuitive behavior: A LOCK on a direct reference does lock both the reference and its target resource. A LOCK with Depth = infinity on a collection that contains direct references locks both the direct references and their target resources. Slein et al. Page 10 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 If any of the targets of the direct references are collections, the server does lock the members of those collections. In the case of redirect references, however, it is not possible to obtain this intuitive LOCK behavior and also meet other goals: o Redirect references should be simple for servers to implement. In particular, a server should never have to resolve a redirect reference. A server should not have to provide proxy capabilities in order to implement redirect references. o Non-referencing clients should be able to use both direct and redirect references. o There should be consistency between the behavior of LOCK on a single referential resource and the behavior of LOCK on a collection that contains referential resources. We have sacrificed support for non-referencing clients and the intuitive locking behavior in order to preserve the meaning of "redirect reference" and consistency between locking collections containing redirect references and locking redirect references. Behavior for locking redirect references was determined by what is possible for the case of locking collections: A LOCK with Depth = infinity on a collection that contains redirect references locks the redirect references, but not their targets. This gives part of the expected lock behavior without forcing the server to resolve the redirect reference or become a proxy server in cases where the target resides on a different server. The response does not include 302 status codes for the redirect references. This is because any 302 status for a response element would cause the entire lock operation to fail, and force clients to lock each collection member individually whenever there are any redirect references in a collection. The response element does include DAV:reftype and DAV:reftarget properties so that a referencing client can lock the targets if it wishes. (There will be no hint in any response code that there are redirect references whose targets need to be locked. The client will most likely not lock any targets until it attempts an operation on the target and gets a 302 response.) Non-referencing clients cannot lock the targets of the redirect references and may never realize that the targets have not been locked. Clearly, a LOCK with Depth = infinity on a collection will not follow any redirect references whose targets are collections into the target collections; it will not cause any members of those target collections to be locked. A LOCK on a redirect reference locks only the reference, not its target. It does not return a 302 response. The response does include the Ref- Type and Ref-Target headers, so that a referencing client can lock the target resource if it wishes. Non-referencing clients cannot lock the target of a redirect reference. This behavior is designed to be consistent with the behavior just described for collections. The No-Passthrough header can be used with LOCK requests, and in all cases causes only the references, and not their targets, to be locked. 4.7 Other WebDAV Operations on Redirect Referential Resources Slein et al. Page 11 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 Although non-referencing WebDAV clients cannot create referential resources, they should be able to use the references created by reference-aware WebDAV clients. They should be able to follow any references to their targets. To make this possible, a server that receives a PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, MKCOL, or MKREF request made via a redirect reference MUST return a 302 (Moved Temporarily) status code. The client and server MUST follow [HTTP] Section 10.3.3 "302 Moved Temporarily," but with these additional rules: o The Location response header MUST contain the target URI of the reference. o The response MUST include the Ref-Type header. This header allows reference-aware WebDAV clients to recognize the resource as a reference and understand the reason for the redirection. A reference-aware WebDAV client can act on this response in one of two ways. It can, like a non-referencing client, resubmit the request to the URI in the Location header in order to operate on the target resource. Alternatively, it can resubmit the request to the URI of the redirect reference with the No-Passthrough header in order to operate on the reference itself. The No-Passthrough header causes the request to be applied to the reference itself, and prevents a 302 response. If a reference-aware client knows before submitting its request that the request-URI identifies a redirect reference, it can save the round trip caused by the 302 response by using No-Passthrough in its initial request to the URI. Since MKCOL and MKREF fail when applied to existing resources, if the client attempts to resubmit the request to the target resource, the request will fail (unless the reference is a dangling reference). Similarly, if the client attempts to resubmit the request to the reference with a No-Passthrough header, the request will fail. 4.8 Other WebDAV Operations on Direct Referential Resources With the exception of DELETE, MOVE, and COPY, which were discussed above, operations on direct references affect the target resource, not the reference, unless the No-Passthrough header is used. Unless the No-Passthrough header is used, a PROPPATCH on a direct reference modifies the properties of its target resource, not the properties of the reference itself. Unless the No-Passthrough header is used, a PROPFIND on a direct reference returns the properties of its target resource, not the properties of the reference itself. If the No-Passthrough header is used with a PROPPATCH or PROPFIND request on a direct reference, the operation is applied to the reference itself rather than to its target resource. MKCOL and MKREF fail if their request-URI identifies an existing Slein et al. Page 12 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 resource of any kind. Consequently, when submitted to a target resource via a direct reference, they fail unless the reference is a dangling reference. If they are submitted to an existing direct reference with the No-Passthrough header, they also fail. 4.9 HTTP Operations on Redirect Referential Resources Although existing HTTP clients cannot create referential resources, they should be able to read collections created by reference-aware WebDAV clients. They should be able to follow any references identified by URIs in those collections to their targets. To make this possible, a server that receives a GET or HEAD on a redirect reference MUST return a 302 (Moved Temporarily) status code. The server MUST follow [HTTP] Section 10.3.3 "302 Moved Temporarily," but with these additional rules: o The Location header MUST contain the target URI of the reference. o The response MUST include all referencing entity headers that make sense for redirect references: Ref-Type and Ref-Target. o The response MUST also include those HTTP headers that make sense for referential resources, at a minimum: Cache-Control, Age, ETag, Expires, and Last-Modified. The second and third of these rules preserve normal GET and HEAD behavior for reference-aware WebDAV clients. To enable existing HTTP clients to use PUT, POST, or OPTIONS via redirect references, a server that receives any of these requests on a redirect reference MUST return a 302 (Moved Temporarily). The client and server MUST follow [HTTP] Section 10.3.3 "302 Moved Temporarily," but with these additional rules: o The Location response header MUST contain the target URI of the reference. o The response MUST include the Ref-Type header. This header allows reference-aware WebDAV clients to recognize the resource as a reference and understand the reason for the redirection. Reference-aware clients can act on a 302 response in either of two ways. Like plain HTTP clients, they can resubmit the request to the URI in the Location header (the URI of the target resource). They may, however, want to operate on the reference rather than on its target. In this case, they may resubmit the request to the URI of the reference and include the No-Passthrough header with the request. The No-Passthrough header causes the request to be applied to the reference itself, and prevents a 302 response. If a reference-aware client knows before submitting its request that the request-URI identifies a redirect reference, it can save the round trip caused by the 302 response by using No-Passthrough in its initial request to the URI. The No-Passthrough header can be used with GET or HEAD to retrieve the Slein et al. Page 13 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 headers of a redirect reference, although this is not necessary since the headers would accompany a 302 response in any case. The No- Passthrough header can be used with PUT to replace the redirect reference with an ordinary resource or with OPTIONS to retrieve the capabilities of a redirect reference. Clients MUST NOT, however, use the No-Passthrough header with POST. Since a reference cannot accept another entity as its subordinate, an attempt to POST to a reference with No-Passthrough will also fail. If a server receives a POST request with the No-Passthrough header on a redirect reference, it MUST fail the request with a 400 (Bad Request) status code. 4.10 HTTP Operations on Direct Referential Resources GET, HEAD, PUT, POST, and OPTIONS on direct references are automatically passed through to their target resources. GET returns the content and headers of the target resource, HEAD returns the headers of the target resource, PUT replaces the content of the target resource, POST performs the expected function at the target resource, and OPTIONS reports the communication options available at the target resource. The No-Passthrough request header may be used with GET, HEAD, PUT, or OPTIONS to view the headers or capabilities of the reference, rather than its target. The No-Passthrough request header MUST NOT be used with POST, which cannot be applied to references. If a server receives a POST request on a direct reference with the No-Passthrough header, it MUST fail the request with a 400 (Bad Request) status code. 4.11 Operations on Targets of Referential Resources In general, operations on targets of weak referential resources have no effect on the referential resource. However, servers that choose to maintain the integrity of references are free to make changes to the state of references when moving or deleting their targets. When moving a target resource, a server MAY insert an optional step into the semantics of MOVE as defined in [WebDAV] for the purpose of maintaining referential integrity. Between the copy step and the delete step of a MOVE, the server MAY perform an update step, which changes the DAV:reftarget property of any references to the target to reflect its new location. When deleting a target resource, a server MAY perform any internal operations necessary to implement its policy on preserving referential integrity. For example, it might delete any references to the deleted target, or it might flag them as having a deleted target, or it might replace references with copies of the target. 4.12 Discovering a Target’s References An optional DAV:references property on the target resource provides a list of referential resources whose DAV:reftarget property points to Slein et al. Page 14 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 that target resource. If present, DAV:references is a read-only property, maintained by the server. By retrieving this property, a client can discover the URIs of the references that point to the target, and so can also discover the collections that contain those URIs as members. As for all DAV: properties, this specification is silent as to how the DAV:references property is implemented on the server. The DAV:references property is expected to be supported mainly by Document Management Systems (DMSs) and other servers that will maintain the property only for references within their own domain. It is not in general possible for a server to maintain the property for references on other servers. If a reference on a different server points to the target, the server where the target is located is unlikely to know about that reference. This protocol provides no mechanism for one server to notify another of the creation of a reference to one of its resources. Consequently, the list of references in DAV:reftarget may be incomplete. Rationale: A number of scenarios require clients to navigate from a target resource to the references that point to it, and to the collections that contain the URIs of those references. This capability is particularly important for DMSs, which may populate their collections entirely by reference. Their clients may need to determine, for any object in the DMS, what collections contain URIs that identify references to that object. It is also important in other contexts. For example, some servers enforce referential integrity by refusing to delete any resource that is referenced by other resources. In such an environment, the client must be able to discover the references in order to delete them before attempting to delete the target. Risks: When deciding whether to support the DAV:references property, server implementors / administrators should balance the benefits it provides against the cost of maintaining the property and the security risks enumerated in Sections 12.4 and 12.5. 4.13 Behavior of Dangling Direct References Whenever the No-Passthrough header accompanies a request on a dangling direct reference, the request succeeds. Since No-Passthrough causes the request to be applied to the reference rather than to its target, it does not matter that the target resource does not exist. The client will not be informed that the reference points to a nonexistent target. In the absence of the No-Passthrough header, the responses MUST be as follows: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS, POST, PROPFIND, and PROPPATCH respond with 404 (Not Found), but the Ref-Type and Ref-Target headers are included in the response, so that the client can tell that it is the target, and not the reference, that was not found. If LOCK or UNLOCK is submitted to a direct reference that is broken, the response is 404 (Not Found). The Ref-Type and Ref-Target headers are included in the response, so that the client can tell that it is the target, and not the reference, that was not found. Slein et al. Page 15 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 If, however, a PROPFIND, LOCK, or UNLOCK with Depth header greater than 0 on a collection encounters a dangling direct reference inside the collection, the response is a 207 (Multi-Status). The DAV:response element for the dangling reference will have a status of 404 (Not Found). The DAV:reftype and DAV:reftarget properties of the references are included in the response. Their presence informs the client that it is the target, not the reference, that was not found. These two elements are extensions to the DAV:response element as defined in {WEBDAV]. For example, Request: PROPFIND /collection1/ HTTP/1.1 Host: www.somehost.com Depth: 1 Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: xxxx Response: HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: xxxx http://www.somehost.com/collection1/ Smith, J.H. My Working Collection HTTP/1.1 200 OK http://www.somehost.com/collection1/directref7 HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found http://www.somehost.com/collection2/file19 Target resource not found. Slein et al. Page 16 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 PUT succeeds, creating a new resource at the location specified by the reference’s DAV:reftarget property. MKREF and MKCOL succeed, since there is no existing resource at the target URI. MOVE and DELETE succeed, since they always affect the reference rather than its target. For MOVE, the reference at the destination will be broken, just as the reference at the source was. The behavior of COPY is TBD. 4.14 Chains of Direct References Unless a No-Passthrough header is present, any operation on a direct reference that is part of a chain of direct references gets passed through to the target of the last reference in the chain. Whenever a response is required to include the Ref-Target header, for a chain of direct references, there MUST be a Ref-Target header for each reference in the chain. In order for the client to know which reference in the chain each Ref-Target belongs to, the value of each Ref-Target header MUST include a hop-number of the reference as well as the URL of its target resource. For example, Request: HEAD /math/ref1 HTTP/1.1 Host: www.somehost.edu Response: HTTP/1.1 200 ok Ref-Type: direct Ref-Target: 0; http://www.somehost.edu/logic/ref2 Ref-Target: 1; http://www.somehost.edu/library/ref3 Ref-Target: 2; http://www.somehost.edu/library/frege/grundgesetze.html . . A server cannot tell whether a dangling reference once pointed to an ordinary resource or to another reference in a chain of direct references. When a break occurs before the end of a chain of direct references, the server’s behavior will be the same as for any other dangling direct reference, as described in Section 4.13. For example, a PUT will create the new resource at the location specified by the DAV:reftarget property of the broken reference, even if that is in the middle of what was once a chain of direct references. 4.15 Summary of Referencing Headers Required in Responses This section summarizes the rules that determine which referencing Slein et al. Page 17 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 headers are included in responses to requests on references. The normative statements that are summarized here can be found in Sections 4.5 - 4.10, 4.13, 4.14, 6.1, and 6.2. Reference Type | No-Passthrough | Method | Headers in Response -------------------------------------------------------------------- both | N/A | All | Ref-Type -------------------------------------------------------------------- direct | No | All | Ref-Target -------------------------------------------------------------------- direct | Yes | All except | Ref-Target optional | | GET, HEAD, | | | LOCK | -------------------------------------------------------------------- direct | Yes | GET, HEAD, | Ref-Target | | LOCK | -------------------------------------------------------------------- redirect | N/A | GET, HEAD | Ref-Target o Every response to a request on a reference includes the Ref-Type header, so that the client knows that it was operating on a reference, and can understand the behavior of the reference. o Every response to a request on a direct reference includes the Ref- Target header unless the No-Passthrough header accompanies the request. This allows the client to tell what resource was affected by the operation. o Since a request that includes the No-Passthrough header affects only the reference, the response to such a request on a direct reference is not required to include the Ref-Target header except in the case of GET or HEAD. o Since [HTTP] requires responses to GET and HEAD to include all entity headers, Ref-Target is included in all responses to GET and HEAD requests on direct references with the No-Passthrough header. o Since LOCK on a direct reference locks only the reference, and not its target, the No-Passthrough header has no effect on its default behavior. Whether or not the No-Passthrough header is used with LOCK on a direct reference, the Ref-Target header is included in the response. This gives the client the information it needs to lock the target resource. o Since [HTTP] requires responses to GET and HEAD to include all entity headers, Ref-Target is included in all responses to GET and HEAD requests on redirect references. Requests on collections with Depth header greater than 0 typically get Multi-Status responses. Consequently, information about any references in the collection cannot be returned in headers. Instead, the corresponding DAV properties are returned in the DAV:response elements for the references. 5 Ordered Collections Slein et al. Page 18 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 5.1 Overview Collections on a compliant server may be ordered, but need not be. It is up to the client to decide whether a given collection is ordered and, if so, to specify the semantics to be used for ordering its members. If a collection is ordered, each of its members must be in the ordering exactly once, and the ordering must not include any resource that is not a member of the collection. Only one ordering can be attached to any collection. Multiple orderings of the same resources can be achieved by creating multiple collections referencing those resources, and attaching a different ordering to each collection. The server is responsible for enforcing these constraints on orderings. The server MUST remove a member URI from the ordering when it is removed from the collection. The server MUST add a member URI to the ordering when it is added to the collection. When responding to a PROPFIND on a collection, the server MUST order the response elements according to the ordering defined on the collection. 5.2 Creating an Ordered Collection 5.2.1 Overview When a collection is created, the client can request that it be ordered and specify the semantics of the ordering by using the new Ordered header in the MKCOL request, setting its value to the URI of the semantics to be used or setting its value to DAV:custom if the semantics are not being advertised. If the client does not want the collection to be ordered, it may omit the Ordered header, or use it with the value "DAV:unordered". Every collection MUST have the new DAV:orderingtype property, which indicates whether the collection is ordered and, if so, identifies the semantics of the ordering. A value of DAV:unordered indicates that that collection is not ordered. That is, the client cannot depend on the repeatability of the ordering of results from a PROPFIND request. For collections that are ordered, DAV:orderingtype SHOULD be set to an href that identifies the semantics of the ordering, allowing a human user or software package to insert new collection members into the ordering intelligently. Although the href MAY point to a resource that contains a definition of the semantics of the ordering, clients are discouraged from accessing that resource, in order to avoid overburdening its server. The DAV:orderingtype property MAY be set to DAV:custom to indicate that the collection is to be ordered, but the semantics of the ordering is not being advertised. If the Ordered header is present on a MKCOL request, the server MUST set the collection's DAV:orderingtype property to the value of the Ordered header. If the Ordered header is not present, the server MUST treat the request as if it had an Ordered header with the value "DAV:unordered", meaning that the collection is not ordered. If the collection is ordered, the server MUST respond to PROPFIND requests on the collection using the specified ordering. Slein et al. Page 19 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 5.2.2 Status Codes Servers MUST use the HTTP/1.1 status codes as defined in [HTTP]. 5.2.3 Example Request: MKCOL /theNorth/ HTTP/1.1 Host: www.server.org Ordered: Response: HTTP/1.1 201 Created In this example, a new, ordered collection was created. Its DAV:orderingtype property has as its value the URI from the Ordered header. In this case, the URI identifies the semantics governing the ordering. As new members are added to the collection, clients or end users can use the semantics to determine where to position the new members in the ordering. 5.3 Setting the Position of a Collection Member 5.3.1 Overview When a new member is added to a collection (for example, with PUT, MKREF, or MKCOL), its position in the ordering can be set with the new Position header. The Position header allows the client to specify that the member should be first in the collection's ordering, last in the collection's ordering, before some other collection member in the collection's ordering, or after some other collection member in the collection's ordering. The server MUST insert the new member into the ordering at the location specified in the Position header, if one is present (and if the collection is ordered); otherwise, it MUST append the new member to the end of the ordering (if the collection is ordered). If a PUT causes an existing resource to be replaced, and if the Position header is absent, the server MUST leave the member at its previous position in thee collection ordering. If the Position header is present, the server MUST remove the member from its previous position, and then insert it at the requested position. 5.3.2 Status Codes Servers MUST use the HTTP/1.1 status codes as defined in [HTTP]. Some likely client errors for when setting the position of a collection member include: 409 (Conflict): The request may be attempting to position the collection member before or after a URI that is not in the collection, or before or after itself, or it may be attempting to position the collection member Slein et al. Page 20 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 in an unordered collection. 5.3.3 Examples Request: MKREF /~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref HTTP/1.1 HOST: www.ics.uci.edu Ref-Target: Position: After Response: HTTP/1.1 201 Created This request resulted in the creation of a new referential resource at www.ics.uci.edu/~whitehead/dav/spec08.ref, which points to the resource identified by the Ref-Target header. The Position header in this example caused the server to set its position in the ordering of the /~whitehead/dav/ collection immediately after requirements.html. Request: MOVE /i-d/draft-webdav-protocol-08.txt HTTP/1.1 Host: www.ics.uci.edu Destination: Position: First Response: HTTP/1.1 409 Conflict In this case, the server returned a 409 Conflict status code because the /~whitehead/dav/ collection is an unordered collection. Consequently, the server was unable to satisfy the Position header. 5.4 Changing the Semantics of a Collection Ordering After a collection has been created, a client can change its ordering semantics, or change an ordered collection to an unordered collection or vice versa, by using PROPPATCH to change the value of its DAV:orderingtype property. The client is then responsible for updating the ordering of the collection members according to the new semantics. PROPPATCH is defined in [WebDAV], Section 7.2. 5.5 Changing the Position of a Collection Member 5.5.1 The ORDERPATCH Method To change the positions of collection members in the collection's ordering, the client MUST use an ORDERPATCH request with a request body containing an order XML element. The request-URI of an ORDERPATCH request is the URI of the collection whose ordering is to be updated. The order XML element identifies the member URIs whose positions are to be changed, and describes their new positions in the ordering. Each new Slein et al. Page 21 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 position can be specified as first in the ordering, last in the ordering, before some other collection member in the ordering, or after some other collection member in the ordering. The server MUST apply the changes in the order they appear in the order element. 5.5.2 Status Codes Since multiple changes can be requested in a single ORDERPATCH request, the server MUST return a 207 Multi-Status response, as defined in [WebDAV]. Within the 207 Multi-Status response, the following status codes are possible: 200 (OK): The change in ordering was successfully made. 409 (Conflict): An attempt was made to position the collection member before or after a URI that is not in the collection, or before or after itself, or an attempt was made to position the collection member in an unordered collection. A request to reposition a collection member to the same place in the ordering is not an error. 5.5.3 Example Consider a collection /coll-1/ with members ordered as follows: nunavut.map nunavut.img baffin.map baffin.desc baffin.img iqaluit.map nunavut.desc iqaluit.img iqaluit.desc Request: ORDERPATCH /coll-1/ HTTP/1.1 Host: www.nunanet.com Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: xxx nunavut.desc nunavut.map Slein et al. Page 22 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 iqaluit.img Response: HTTP/1.1 207 Multi-Status Content-Type: text/xml Content-Length: xxx http://www.nunanet.com/coll-1/nunavut.desc HTTP/1.1 200 OK http://www.nunanet.com/coll-1/iqaluit.img HTTP/1.1 200 OK In this example, after the request has been processed, the collection's ordering is as follows: nunavut.map nunavut.desc nunavut.img baffin.map baffin.desc baffin.img iqaluit.map iqaluit.desc iqaluit.img 5.5.4 Design Rationale The decision to introduce the new ORDERPATCH method was made after investigating the possibility of using the existing MOVE method with a Position header. The use of MOVE initially looked appealingly simple: MOVE /root/coll-1/foo HTTP/1.1 Host: www.somehost.com Destination: Position: First Unfortunately, several features of the semantics of MOVE make it unsuitable for changing the position of a collection member in the collection's ordering. First, [WebDAV] defines MOVE as logically equivalent to a copy followed by a delete of the source resource. This definition makes it impossible to MOVE a resource to a destination URL Slein et al. Page 23 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 that is the same as the source URL. The resource would be deleted rather than moved. Second, [WebDAV] states that when moving a resource to a destination where a resource already exists, the Overwrite header must be "T", and in this case the server must DELETE the resource at the destination before performing the MOVE. Again, this makes it impossible to MOVE a resource to the same location. Finally, [WebDAV] states that locks are lost on a MOVE, an outcome that seems undesirable in this case. 6 New Headers 6.1 Ref-Target Entity Header Ref-Target = "Ref-Target" ":" 1#([hop-count ";"] Coded-url) hop-count = 1*DIGIT Coded-url is defined in [WebDAV], Section 8.4. In general, the Ref-Target header has the simpler form: Ref-Target = "Ref-Target" ":" Coded-url The more complicated syntax is provided only for use in responses involving chains of direct references. The Ref-Target header is used with MKREF requests to identify the target resource of the new referential resource being created. It is a required header in MKREF requests. When used with a MKREF request, its value is simply a Coded-url, and only a single value is allowed. For an example, see Section 4.3.3. Servers MUST include the Ref-Target header in responses to the following types of requests: Reference Type | No-Passthrough | Method ------------------------------------------------- direct | No | All ------------------------------------------------- direct | Yes | GET, HEAD, LOCK ------------------------------------------------- redirect | N/A | GET, HEAD The only case where multiple values of Ref-Target are allowed is when it is included in a response for a reference that is part of a chain of direct references. In this case, the response MUST include a value of Ref-Target for each reference in the chain. Each value MUST include a hop-count, starting with 0, indicating which reference in the chain that Ref-Target belongs to. For an example, see Section 4.14. 6.2 Ref-Type Entity Header Ref-Type = "Ref-Type" ":" ("DAV:direct" | "DAV:redirect") The Ref-Type header is defined to distinguish between direct and redirect references. The possible values of this header are DAV:direct and DAV:redirect. If the header is not present on a MKREF request, the Slein et al. Page 24 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 server MUST treat the request as if it has a Ref-Type header with the value DAV:redirect. Servers MUST include the Ref-Target header in every response to a request whose request-URI identifies a reference. 6.3 Ref-Integrity Request Header Ref-Integrity = "Ref-Integrity" ":" ("do-not-enforce" | "enforce" | extend) extend = 1#CHAR The Ref-Integrity header is defined primarily to allow future support for strong references. It specifies whether the server should enforce referential integrity for a referential resource being created with MKREF. The value "do-not-enforce" means that the server MUST NOT enforce referential integrity for the newly created reference. A client might use this value if, for example, it wanted to populate a collection with references before their content was made available on the Web. The value "enforce" means that the server MUST enforce referential integrity for the newly created reference, but does not constrain the server to use any particular policy for enforcing referential integrity. It is beyond the scope of this specification to define precisely the meaning of referential integrity or to enumerate any set of policies that might be considered compliant. Clients and servers may use other values of the Ref-Integrity header by private agreement, to specify more precisely the desired policy for enforcing referential integrity. If a server receives an extension value that it does not understand, it MUST fail the request. If the Ref-Integrity header is not present on a MKREF request, the server is free to enforce referential integrity or not, and if it does enforce referential integrity, it is free to follow any policy it chooses. 6.4 No-Passthrough Request Header No-Passthrough = "No-Passthrough" ":" The optional No-Passthrough header can be used on any request to a reference except POST. For a direct reference, it forces the request to be applied to the reference itself rather than to its target. For a redirect reference, it prevents a 302 response and instead causes the request to be applied to the reference itself. If the No-Passthrough header is used on a request to any other sort of resource besides a reference, the server SHOULD ignore it. If the No-Passthrough header is used with a POST request, the server MUST respond with a 400 (Bad Request). The No-Passthrough header can be used with PROPFIND requests on collections with Depth = infinity. When it is used in this way, the Slein et al. Page 25 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 server MUST return the properties of any redirect references in the collection, and not return 302 (Moved Temporarily) status codes for them. It MUST also return the properties of any direct references in the collection (not the properties of their targets), and it MUST NOT follow any direct references to collections into their target collections. The No-Passthrough header can be used with LOCK requests on collections with Depth = infinity. When it is used in this way, the server MUST lock any redirect references in the collection. It MUST also lock any direct references in the collection (not their target resources), and it MUST NOT follow any direct references to collections into their target collections. 6.5 Ordered Entity Header Ordered = "Ordered" ":" ("DAV:unordered" | "DAV:custom" | Coded-url) The Ordered header may be used with MKCOL to request that the new collection be ordered and to specify its ordering semantics. A value of "DAV:unordered" indicates that the collection is not ordered. That is, the client cannot depend on the repeatability of the ordering of results from a PROPFIND request. A Coded-url value indicates that the collection is ordered, and identifies the semantics of the ordering, allowing a human user or software package to insert new collection members into the ordering intelligently. The Coded-url MAY point to a resource that contains a definition of the semantics of the ordering. A value of "DAV:custom" indicates that the collection is to be ordered, but the semantics of the ordering is not being advertised. If the Ordered header is not present on a MKCOL request, the server MUST treat the request as if it had an Ordered header with the value "DAV:unordered". 6.6 Position Request Header Position = "Position" ":" ("First" | "Last" | (("Before" | "After") Coded-url)) The Position header may be used with any method that adds a member to a collection to tell the server where in the collection ordering to position the new member being added to the collection. It may be used for both ordinary and referential members. If the Coded-url is a relative URL, it is interpreted relative to the collection to which the new member is being added. If the Position request header is not used, then: If the request is replacing an existing resource, the server MUST preserve the present ordering. If the request is adding a new member to the collection, the server MUST append the new member to the end of the ordering (if the collection is ordered). Slein et al. Page 26 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 7 New Properties 7.1 reftarget Property Name: reftarget Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A required property of referential resources that provides an efficient way for clients to discover the URI of the target resource. This is a read-only property, whose value can only be set by using the Ref-Target header with a MKREF request. Value: URI of the target resource. 7.2 refintegrity Property Name: refintegrity Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A required property of a referential resource that indicates whether the server enforces referential integrity for that reference. The refintegrity property is defined to allow future support for strong references. The only value currently defined for refintegrity is weak, which means that the server does not enforce referential integrity for the reference. Although a server may assign another value to identify its policy for enforcing referential integrity for the reference, it cannot count on clients understanding such extension values. This is a readonly property. Value: weak or an extension value 7.3 reftype Property Name: reftype Namespace: DAV Purpose: A required property of a referential resource that identifies the reference as direct or redirect. This is a read-only property, whose value can only be set by using the Ref-Type header with a MKREF request. Value: direct | redirect 7.4 references Property Name: references Namespace: DAV: Purpose: Enables clients to discover, for any target resource, what references point to it and what collections contain it by reference. This is an optional property. If present, it is a read-only property, maintained by the server. Value: List of the URIs of the references that point to the target Slein et al. Page 27 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 resource. 7.5 orderingtype Property Name: orderingtype Namespace: DAV: Purpose: Indicates whether the collection is ordered and, if so, uniquely identifies the semantics of the ordering being used. May also point to an explanation of the semantics in human and / or machine-readable form. At a minimum, this allows human users who add members to the collection to understand where to position them in the ordering. Value: unordered for an unordered collection, or a URI that uniquely identifies the semantics of the collection's ordering. The URI MAY point to a definition of the ordering semantics. The value custom may be used for a collection that is to be ordered, but for which the semantics are not being advertised. 8 New XML Elements 8.1 reference XML Element Name: reference Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A new value of the DAV:resourcetype property that identifies its resource as a referential resource. The DAV:resourcetype property of a referential resource MUST have this value. Value: EMPTY 8.2 direct XML Element Name: direct Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A value for the DAV:reftype property that identifies its resource as a direct reference. Value: EMPTY 8.3 redirect XML Element Name: redirect Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A value for the DAV:reftype property that identifies its resource as a redirect reference. Value: EMPTY Slein et al. Page 28 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 8.4 weak XML Element Name: weak Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A value of the DAV:refintegrity property. It means that the server does not enforce referential integrity for the reference to which the property belongs. Value: EMPTY 8.5 location XML Element Name: location Namespace: DAV: Purpose: For use with 302 (Moved Temporarily) response codes in Multi-Status responses. It contains the URL of the temporary location of the resource. In the context of redirect references, this value is the URL of the target resource. It is analogous to the Location header in HTTP 302 responses defined in [HTTP] Section 10.3.3 "302 Moved Temporarily." This is an extension to the syntax of the DAV:response element defined in [WebDAV]. Value: href 8.6 unordered XML Element Name: unordered Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A value of the DAV:orderingtype property that indicates that the collection is not ordered. That is, the client cannot depend on the repeatability of the ordering of results from a PROPFIND request. Value: EMPTY 8.7 custom XML Element Name: custom Namespace: DAV: Purpose: A value of the DAV:orderingtype property that indicates that the collection is ordered, but the semantics of the ordering are not being advertised. Value: EMPTY 8.8 order XML Element Name: order Slein et al. Page 29 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 Namespace: DAV Purpose: For use with the new ORDERPATCH method. Describes a change to be made in a collection ordering. Value: A description of the new positions of collection members in the collection's ordering. 8.9 ordermember XML Element Name: ordermember Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the order XML Element, and describes the new position of a single collection member in the collection's ordering. Value: An href containing a relative URI, and a description of its new position in the ordering. The href XML element is defined in [WebDAV], Section 11.3. 8.10 position XML Element Name: position Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the member XML element. Describes the new position in a collection's ordering of one of the collection's members. Value: The new position can be described as first in the collection's ordering, last in the collection's ordering, before some other member of the collection, or after some other member of the collection. 8.11 first XML Element Name: first Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the position XML element. Describes the collection member's position as first in the collection's ordering. Value: EMPTY 8.12 last XML Element Name: last Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the position XML element. Describes the collection member's position as last in the collection's ordering. Value: EMPTY Slein et al. Page 30 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 8.13 before XML Element Name: before Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the position XML element. Describes the collection member's position as coming before some other collection member in the collection's ordering. Value: href of the member it precedes in the ordering 8.14 after XML Element Name: after Namespace: DAV Purpose: Occurs in the position XML element. Describes the collection member's position as coming after some other collection member in the collection's ordering. Value: href of the member it follows in the ordering 9 Extensions to the DAV:multistatus XML Element As described in Sections 4.5 and 4.6, the DAV:location element and the DAV:reftype property may be returned in the DAV:response element of a 207 Multi-Status response, to allow clients to resubmit their requests to the target resource of a redirect reference. As described in Section 4.13, the DAV:reftype and DAV:reftarget properties may be returned in the DAV:response element of a 207 Multi- Status response, to indicate that a problem is not with a direct reference, but with its target resource. Consequently, the definition of the DAV:response XML element changes to the following: 10 Capability Discovery 10.1 Using OPTIONS Since referencing and ordering are independent capabilities, a resource MAY support either or both. A resource that provides referencing MUST support redirect references, and MAY in addition support direct references. A response to an OPTIONS request MUST indicate which of these capabilities the resource supports. This specification defines two new methods: MKREF in support of referencing, and ORDERPATCH in support of ordering. The response MUST indicate which of these methods the resource allows. In addition, the Slein et al. Page 31 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 response MUST include the DAV header, as described in Sections 9.1 and 15 of [WebDAV]. Three new compliance classes are defined here for use with the DAV header: DAV:basicref, DAV:directref, and DAV:orderedcoll. The value DAV:basicref indicates that the resource supports at least redirect references. The value DAV:directref indicates that the resource supports direct references. The value DAV:orderedcoll indicates that the resource supports ordering. 10.2 Example Request: OPTIONS /somecollection/ HTTP/1.1 HOST: somehost.org Response: HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 20:52:29 GMT Connection: close Accept-Ranges: none Allow: OPTIONS, GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, COPY, MOVE, MKCOL, PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, LOCK, UNLOCK, MKREF, ORDERPATCH Public: OPTIONS, GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, TRACE, COPY, MOVE, MKCOL, PROPFIND, PROPPATCH, LOCK, UNLOCK, MKREF, ORDERPATCH DAV: 1, 2, DAV:basicref, DAV:directref, DAV:orderedcoll This response indicates that the resource /somecollection/ is level 1 and level 2 compliant, as defined in [WebDAV], and in addition provides basic referencing, direct references, and ordered collections. 11 Dependencies on Other Specifications TBD 12 Security Considerations This section is provided to detail issues concerning security implications of which WebDAV applications need to be aware. All of the security considerations of HTTP/1.1 and the base WebDAV protocol also apply to WebDAV collections. In addition, referential resources and ordered collections introduce several new security concerns and increase the risk of some existing threats. These issues are detailed below. 12.1 Redirect Loops Although redirect loops were already possible in HTTP 1.1, the introduction of referential resources creates a new avenue for clients to create loops accidentally or maliciously. If the referential resource and its target are on the same server, the server may be able to detect MKREF requests that would create loops. See also [HTTP], Section 10.3 "Redirection 3xx." Slein et al. Page 32 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 12.2 References and Denial of Service The introduction of referential resources creates a new avenue for denial of service attacks. Clients can create heavily used references to target locations that were not designed for heavy usage. 12.3 Maintaining Referential Integrity May Reveal Private Locations Although this specification does not require servers to maintain referential integrity, it does not prevent them from doing so. If a server updates a reference’s DAV:reftarget property when its target resource is moved, there is the risk that a private location will be revealed in the new value of DAV:reftarget. Clients can avoid this risk by doing a COPY followed by a DELETE rather than a MOVE. 12.4 DAV:references and Denial of Service If the server maintains the DAV:references property in response to references created in other administrative domains, it is exposed to hostile attempts to make it devote resources to adding references to the list. 12.5 DAV:references and Malicious Deletion of Resources Servers that support the DAV:references property should insure that clients cannot create editable properties with the name DAV:references. An editable DAV:references property would constitute a security risk on servers that enforce referential integrity by deleting references when their target is deleted. These servers could be tricked into deleting a resource by listing it in the DAV:references property of some target resource. 12.6 Malicious Modifications of Ordering Particularly in large collections, moving a collection member to a different position in the ordering can make it very difficult for users to find. 12.7 Denial of Service and DAV:orderingtype There may be some risk of denial of service at sites that are advertised in the DAV:orderingtype property of collections. However, it is anticipated that widely-deployed applications will use hard-coded values for frequently-used ordering semantics rather than looking up the semantics at the location specified by DAV:orderingtype. 13 Internationalization Considerations This specification follows the practices of [WebDAV] in encoding all human-readable content using XML [XML] and in the treatment of names. Consequently, this specification complies with the IETF Character Set Policy [Alvestrand]. WebDAV applications MUST support the character set tagging, character set encoding, and the language tagging functionality of the XML Slein et al. Page 33 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 specification. This constraint ensures that the human-readable content of this specification complies with [Alvestrand]. As in [WebDAV}, names in this specification fall into three categories: names of protocol elements such as methods and headers, names of XML elements, and names of properties. Naming of protocol elements follows the precedent of HTTP, using English names encoded in USASCII for methods and headers. The names of XML elements used in this specification are English names encoded in UTF-8. For error reporting, [WebDAV] follows the convention of HTTP/1.1 status codes, including with each status code a short, English description of the code (e.g., 423 Locked). Internationalized applications will ignore this message, and display an appropriate message in the user's language and character set. For rationales for these decisions and advice for application implementors, see [WebDAV]. 14 IANA Considerations TBD 15 Copyright 16 Intellectual Property 17 Acknowledgements This draft has benefited from thoughtful discussion by Jim Amsden, Steve Carter, Ken Coar, Ellis Cohen, Bruce Cragun, Spencer Dawkins, Rajiv Dulepet, David Durand, Roy Fielding, Yaron Goland, Fred Hitt, Alex Hopmann, Marcus Jager, Chris Kaler, Manoj Kasichainula, Rohit Khare, Daniel LaLiberte, Steve Martin, Surendra Koduru Reddy, Sam Ruby, Bradley Sergeant, Nick Shelness, John Stracke, John Tigue, John Turner, and others. 18 References [WebDAV] Y. Y. Goland, E. J. Whitehead, Jr., A. Faizi, S. R. Carter, D. Jensen, "HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring - WebDAV." Draft- ietf-webdav-protocol-09. Internet Draft, work in progress. Microsoft, U.C. Irvine, Netscape, Novell. November, 1998. [DASL] Saveen Reddy, D. Jensen, Surendra Reddy, R. Henderson, J. Davis, A. Babich, "DAV Searching & Locating." Draft-reddy-dasl-protocol-03. Internet Draft, work in progress. Microsoft, Novell, Oracle, Netscape, Xerox, Filenet. November, 1998. [CollReq] J. Slein, J. Davis, "Requirements for Advanced Collection Functionality in WebDAV." Draft-ietf-webdav-collection-reqts-02. Internet Draft, work in progress. Xerox, 1998. [HTTP] R. Fielding, J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H. Frystyk, T. Berners-Lee, "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1." RFC 2068. UC Irvine, DEC, Slein et al. Page 34 INTERNET-DRAFT WebDAV Collections Protocol January 1999 MIT/LCS. January, 1997. [RFC2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels." RFC 2119, BCP 14. Harvard University. March, 1997. [XML] T. Bray, J. Paoli, C.M. Sperberg-McQueen, "Extensible Markup Language (XML)." World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-xml- 19980210. http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210. 19 Authors' Addresses J. Slein Xerox Corporation 800 Phillips Road, 105-50C Webster, NY 14580 Email: jslein@crt.xerox.com J. Davis Xerox Corporation 3333 Coyote Hill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Email: jdavis@parc.xerox.com G. Clemm Rational Software Corporation 20 Maguire Road Lexington, MA 02173-3104 Email: gclemm@rational.com C. Fay FileNet Corporation 3565 Harbor Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1420 Email: cfay@filenet.com E.J. Whitehead Jr. Dept. of Information and Computer Science University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697-3425 Email: ejw@ics.uci.edu A. Babich FileNet Corporation 3565 Harbor Boulevard Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1420 Email: ababich@filenet.com 20 Appendices 20.1 Appendix 1 - Extensions to the WebDAV Document Type Definition