Re: Versions and configurations

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David J. Fiander: "Re: Version identifier in URL"
• Previous message: Kenji Takahashi: "Re: Version identifier in URL"
• Maybe in reply to: Keith Dawson: "Versions and configurations"
• Next in thread: David J. Fiander: "Re: Versions and configurations"

>From:  "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
>
>Good point. If what we're after here is not part of the interface
>between web clients and servers, but rather a new interface
>between web servers and CM systems, then URL syntax conventions
>are fine: just like ?abc-1&def-2 in CGI.

Hmmm.  This is, I think conflating two things again.  The
interface that the website developer/maintainer will be using is,
more than likely, going to be a web client.  Thus, whatever we
develop will involve the interaction between the web client and
the web server, and how that _maps onto_ the interaction between
the subsequent web server and its underlying VCS.

- David

• Next message: David J. Fiander: "Re: Version identifier in URL"
• Previous message: Kenji Takahashi: "Re: Version identifier in URL"
• Maybe in reply to: Keith Dawson: "Versions and configurations"
• Next in thread: David J. Fiander: "Re: Versions and configurations"