Re: More versioning thoughts.

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: David J. Fiander: "Re: Versioning Thoughts (in HTML)"
• Previous message: David J. Fiander: "Re: High-level capabilities"
• Maybe in reply to: Andre van der Hoek: "More versioning thoughts."
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: More versioning thoughts."

> Sometimes you can get people to agree on the answer even when they
> can't agree on the question. So I'm not so worried about divergent
> goals. On the other hand, a Functional Requirements document would be
> the right way to deal with the issue of common goals. Does someone
> (not me) want to draft a Functional Requirements document and submit
> it by next Thursday as an Internet Draft? (Mainly just to raise
> awareness of the issue.)

Larry, this sounds like a good idea.  My only question is, under
who's aegis will the ID be posted?  Is it an "individual
submission", or will it be posted as an HTTP WG ID?

- David

• Next message: David J. Fiander: "Re: Versioning Thoughts (in HTML)"
• Previous message: David J. Fiander: "Re: High-level capabilities"
• Maybe in reply to: Andre van der Hoek: "More versioning thoughts."
• Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "Re: More versioning thoughts."