From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Bill Thurston) Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Hexahedral decomposition of polyhedra Date: 25 Oct 1993 04:28:19 GMT Organization: U.C. Berkeley Math. Department.
In article <email@example.com>, MCASALE@DELPHI.COM <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >In the process of generating hexahedral finite element meshes, >the following question is important: What are the conditions >on a polyhedron that allow a hexahedral decomposition >of the polyhedron without modifying its boundary? One >condition is that all the faces be quads, i.e., have four >edges. What are the other conditions? Note, for example, that >it is possible to mesh a tetrahedron with hexes, but not >without modifying its faces, i.e., adding vertices. > >Any help would be appreciated. > Mac Casale > email@example.com Hexahedron here means combinatorially equivalent to a cube. This can be taken as a question in combinatorial topology, where the faces can be curvilinear, or one can insist that the hexahedra really have linear faces. Let's look at the topological question first. One way to view this problem is to dualize, that is, take the dual subdivision. The dual of a cell division of the sphere by quadrilaterals is characterized by the property that edges meet in 4's. You can think of it as a subdivision of the sphere obtained by drawing some possibly self-intersecting closed curves that meet themselves and meet each other transversely. This is like a knot or link projection. A hexahedral cell division of the ball is dual to a subdivision obtained by a collection of surfaces inside the ball, intersecting transverely. Each double curve (where a surface intersects itself) has to either be closed, or meet the boundary in two points. So a necessary condition is that there be an even number of quadrilaterals. (There do exist convex polyhedra with an odd number of quadrilateral sides, so this is a nonvacuous condition.) Given a system of curves that does have an even number of self-intersections, it is possible to find a surface with transveral self-intersections having the system of curves as its boundary. (not necessarily dual to a hexahedral decomposition yet though, at this point). First, a simple closed curve bounds a disk. Second, if there is any pair of self-intersections connected by an arc on the system of curves, you can pair them up with a double line of surface, and reduce the problem to one with two fewer double points. The only remaining possibility is that each component of the curve is a figure eight. You can connect any two such together. This gives a way to construct the surface with boundary the given curves. It may not be dual to a hexahedral decomposition, because for instance there may be no interior vertices (corresponding to hexahedra) at all. So, add a bunch of spheres with enough intersection points with the existing surface to make lots of interior vertices. This turns it into the dual of a hexahedral decomposition. This answers the topological question. **** As for the geometric question: My first guess is it can be done geometrically if it can be done topologically, but it looks very tricky. If you're using curvilinear coordinates, then it's irrelevant. Which question are you really trying to answer? It is known that any combinatorial subdivision of the sphere into quadrilaterals can be realized by a convex polyhedron; one strategy would be first to try to show everything can be gotten into convex form (by constructing quadrilateral-cross-section tubes), then analyzing further obstructions. By the way, one easy construction for certain hexahedral decompositions: a tetrahedron divides into 4 hexahedra, so if you start with something with triangulated boundary and divide into quadrilateals, you can always extend it. Bill Thurston
Geometry in Action,
a collection of applications of computational geometry.
David Eppstein, Theory Group, ICS, UC Irvine.
Last update: .