CHI 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Workshop on Designing for Reflective Practitioners

 

Workshop 5 at ACM CHI 2004

Sunday, April 25, 2004

 

Workshop Home Page and Schedule

 

 

CHI 2004 Home Page

 

Workshop Home Page and Schedule

 

Participant Instructions

 

Theme and Call

 

Organizers

Schedule Overview

 

0900 Intro

0915 Session: Communication and Sense-Making

1030 Break

1100 Session: Computer-Supported Learning Environments

1230 Lunch

1400 Session: Integrating Problem Framing and Problem Solving

1530 Break

1600 Session: New Methods and Techniques for Software Development

1730 Wrap-up

 

Session Details

 

Organizers Welcome and Introduction

  • David Redmiles (University of California Irvine): Designing for Reflective Practitioners

 

Session: Communication and Sense-Making

 

  1. Fahri Yetim (New Jersey Institute of Technology): A Meta-Communication Model for Reflective Practitioners.
  2. Kari Kuutti, Tonja Molin-Juustila (University of Oulu): Making the common object of a work "visible" and reflectable: a case of emerging software product
  3. Maria Francesca Costabile (UniversitÓ di Bari), Daniela Fogli (UniversitÓ di Brescia), Piero Mussio (UniversitÓ degli Studi di Milano), Antonio Piccinno (UniversitÓ di Bari): Virtual Workshops to Support Reflection in Action
  4. Gloria Mark, Steve Abrams (University of California, Irvine): Sensemaking and Design Practices in Large-scale Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration

 

Session: Computer-Supported Learning Environments

  1. Effie Lai-Chong Law (Eidgen÷ssische Technische Hochschule ZŘrich): Reflective Design Practices in Human Computer Interaction and Software Engineering
  2. Anders M°rch (University of Oslo), Karianne Omdahl (University of Bergen), Sten Ludvigsen (Univeristy of Oslo): Knowledge Building in Distributed Collaborative Learning: Organizing Information in Multiple Worlds
  3. Carolyn Penstein RosÚ, Vincent Aleven, Cristen Torrey (Carnegie Mellon University): CycleTalk: Supporting Reflection in Design Scenarios with Negotiation Dialogue
  4. Finn Kensing (The IT University of Copenhagen): Designing for, with, and by Reflective Practitioners
  5. Ari Heiskanen (University of Oulu): The Reflective Information Systems Practitioner Approach as a Research and Learning Expedient.

 

Session: Integrating Problem Framing and Problem Solving

 

  1. Bruce Corson (Corson Associates): The Non-denominational Design Studio : Lessons for the Proficiency of Organizations
  2. Mark Bergman, Gloria Mark (University of California, Irvine): Application of Collaborative Conflict in System Design: The Case of the New Millennium Program
  3. Gerhard Fischer (University of Colorado, Boulder): Reflective Practitioners and Unselfconscious Cultures of Design
  4. Robert T.Hughes, Abdullah Al Shebab, Marian Eastwood (University of Brighton): The use of cognitive causal mapping as an aid to professional reflection
  5. Kumiyo Nakakoji (University of Tokyo): Designing for Reflective Practitioners

 

Session: New Methods and Techniques for Software Development

  1. Milorad ToÜić (University of NiÜ): Meta Architecture for Intelligent Information Systems
  2. Cestmir Halbich (CUA Prague): Reflective practitioners in software design ľ A Case study in Extreme programming.
  3. Orit Hazzan (Technion) and Jim Tomayko (Carnegie Mellon University): The Reflective Practitioner Perspective in Software Engineering.
  4. Yunwen Ye (University of Colorado, Boulder,2SRA Key Technology Laboratory): On the Timing of Presenting Situational Talkback in Support of Reflective Practitioners
  5. Aran Lunzer (University of Copenhagen): Interfaces that Reduce the Cost of Examining Alternatives

 

Wrap-up